Ukraine conflict teleconference aims for ‘broader political compromise’

20140324ukraineNukeOn 11 June 2015, an international video conference on the theme of ‘Context and Prospects of Settlement of the Conflict in the East of Ukraine’ took place simultaneously in Braine L’Alleud, Brussels, Belgium, Moscow, Russian Federation and Kiev, Ukraine – for the expert discussions, the distinguished guests included Alexey Gromyko, Doctor of Science (Politics) and director of The Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia), Miroslav Popovich, Doctor of Philosophy, director of The Institute of Philosophy of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Kyiv, Ukraine) Victor Levytskyy, candidate of philosophical sciences, director of the Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation (which arranged and moderated the conference), Alexander Bilokobylskyi, Doctor of Philosophy, director of the Kiev branch of the Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation (Kyiv, Ukraine) and Yossi Beilin, PHD, director of Beilin business foreign affairs.

The teleconference was held between academics and experts of three cities: Kiev, Brussels, and Moscow (Russian Federation). The purpose of the teleconference was declared as being to establish stronger links between the institutions of the civil societies of Ukraine, Russia and Europe. The conference participants presented their interpretations of the conflict, which were intended to go beyond the well-established ways of understanding the conflict which, participants agreed, have previously been formed on the basis of official statements and the rhetoric of the mass media.

The organizers were hopeful that the discussion around the presentation, as well as the discussion of the necessary steps towards a normalization of the situation in Ukraine and Europe would mark the beginning of a long-term dialogue between representatives of the intellectual communities of Ukraine, Europe and Russia. In short, the intended purpose was to reach a consensus at an expert level, which could become a template for broader political compromise.

And the debate was lively – opening proceedings, Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation Director Victor Levytsky said that “constructing a dialogue in the best traditions of goodwill” was the conference’s most important aim – and he added that “the mood of the Ukraine’s population is very important and must be acknowledged”.

“I believe that this conference will make progress towards stabilizing the emotions of Ukrainian society,” Levytsky added.

Alexander Bilokobylskyi agreed, adding: “ Concerning the conflict in East Ukraine, we must seek out similar goals and objectives. “We are confronted by very particular circumstances – the new frontiers in this situation have been artificially created.”

Andrii Suzdaltsev in Moscow said: “Religion exists as a political marker in this conflict,” and Yossi Beilin added: “We can definitely take a lesson from the conflict in Israel – quite frankly, the world has had enough of both sides’ arguments, and wants simply that a solution be found. There can be no doubt that in Ukraine, as in Israel, both sides still feel threatened by the other, and until a way is found to remove this feeling of threat, either above board or behind closed doors, no progress will be made.”

To see an interview with Yossi Beilin, click here, and for more information on the debate, click here. 


Facebook comments

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: A Frontpage, Chechnya, Conflicts, Crimea, EU, EU, Featured Article, Russia, Ukraine, World

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *