Connect with us

Japan

Ten years after Fukushima, Japan remembers 'man-made' nuclear disaster

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

A worker, wearing a protective suit and a mask, is seen from a bus near the No. 3 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co's (TEPCO) tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, Japan February 10, 2016. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

When a huge earthquake and tsunami struck Japan on March 11, 2011, devastating towns and triggering nuclear meltdowns in Fukushima, a stunned world watched the chaotic struggle to contain the world’s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, writes Linda Sieg.

An onslaught of waves sparked by the 9.0-magnitude quake crashed into the northeastern coast, killing nearly 20,000 people and crippling the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant. More than 160,000 residents fled as radiation spewed into the air.

At the time, some - including Prime Minister Naoto Kan - feared Tokyo would need to be evacuated, or worse.

Advertisement

“Fukushima is stamped for the rest of the history of nuclear energy,” said Kiyoshi Kurokawa, head of an investigation that concluded the disaster was “profoundly man-made”.

The government has spent about $300 billion (32.1 trillion yen) to rebuild the tsunami-devastated Tohoku region, but areas around the Fukushima plant remain off-limits, worries about radiation levels linger and many who left have settled elsewhere. Decommissioning of the crippled plant will take decades and billions of dollars.

Japan is again debating the role of nuclear power in its energy mix as the resource-poor country aims to achieve net carbon neutrality by 2050 to fight global warming. But an NHK public TV survey showed 85% of the public worries about nuclear accidents.

Advertisement

Energy policy was left in limbo after Shinzo Abe led his pro-nuclear energy Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) back to power the year after the disaster, ousting the novice Democratic Party of Japan, whose image was tainted by its handling of Fukushima.

“They sort of left things adrift,” said Tobias Harris, senior vice president at consultancy Teneo and author of a book about Abe.

‘RESULT OF COLLUSION’

Kurokawa’s commission, appointed by parliament, concluded in 2012 that the Fukushima accident was “the result of collusion between the government, regulators and Tokyo Electric Power Co” and a lack of governance.

Abe resigned last year, citing poor health, and his successor, Yoshihide Suga, has announced a goal of net carbon neutrality by 2050.

Gradually recovering: Fukushima residents talk ten years on

Proponents say nuclear power is vital to decarbonization. Critics say cost, safety and the challenge of storing nuclear waste are all reasons to avoid it.

“Those talking about atomic power are people in the ‘nuclear village’, who want to protect their vested interests,” former Prime Minister Kan told a news conference last week.

The mass demonstrations against nuclear power seen in the wake of 3/11 have faded, but distrust lingers.

A February Asahi newspaper survey found that nationwide, 53% are opposed to restarting reactors, compared with 32% in favour. In Fukushima, only 16% backed bringing restarting units.

“Ten years have passed and some people have forgotten. The zeal is gone,” said Yu Uchiyama, a University of Tokyo political science professor. “Restarts are not happening, so people think if they just wait, nuclear power will disappear.”

Only nine of Japan’s 33 remaining commercial reactors have been approved for restarts under post-Fukushima safety standards and only four are operating, compared with 54 before the disaster.

Nuclear power supplied just 6% of Japan’s energy needs in the first half of 2020 compared with 23.1% for renewable sources - far behind Germany’s 46.3% - and nearly 70% for fossil fuels.

Extending the lifespan of Japan’s 33 existing commercial reactors to 60 years, there would be only 18 in 2050 and none by 2069, said Takeo Kikkawa, an adviser to the government on energy policy. Newer business lobbies are pushing for renewable energy.

“Japan is a resource-poor country so we should not casually abandon the nuclear option,” Kikkawa told a media briefing. “But in reality, the future of nuclear power is bleak.”

(1 Japanese yen = $0.0094)

Share this article:

Japan

Commissioner Breton in Asia to discuss digital and tech matters

Published

on

This week, Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton (pictured) will travel to Japan and South Korea to engage with officials and industry leaders on digital and tech matters. This will be an opportunity to discuss with Asian partners the upcoming European Chips Act and develop contacts on the broader digital partnership agreements with Japan and Korea, which were announced in the EU Indo-Pacific Strategy.

Today (28 September), Commissioner Breton will meet the Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Ryota Takeda; Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Hiroshi Kajiyama; Digital Transformation Minister Takuya Hirai; the Chairman of the Board of NEC Nobuhiro Endo and the CEO of Fujitsu Takahito Tokita. The following day, on 29 September, Commissioner Breton will meet with Mr Toshiki Kawai, the CEO of Tokyo Electron (TEL), one of the major Japanese semiconductor companies, and attend a round table discussion with business representatives. On 30 September and 1 October, Commissioner Breton will be in South Korea to meet with officials and industry leaders.

Share this article:

Continue Reading

Japan

The Kuril Islands problem as a stumbling point between Russia and Japan

Published

on

The problem of the territorial sovereignty over the Southern Kuril Islands or the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan has been unresolved since the end of the World War II and remains as it is up to nowadays, writes Alex Ivanov, Moscow correspondent.

The issue of ownership of the islands remains in the focus of bilateral relations between Moscow and Tokyo, although the Russian side is making active efforts to "dissolve" this issue and find a replacement for it mainly through economic projects. Nevertheless, Tokyo does not give up trying to present the problem of the Kuril Islands as the main one on the bilateral agenda.

After the war, all the Kuril Islands were incorporated into the USSR, but the ownership of the islands of Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and the Habomai group of islands is disputed by Japan, which considers them an occupied part of the country. Though the 4 islands themselves represent a rather small area, total area of the disputed territory, including the 200-mile economic zone, is approximately 200.000 square kilometres.

Russia claims that its sovereignty over the southern Kuril Islands is absolutely legal and is not subject to doubt and discussion, and declares that it does not recognize the very fact of the existence of a territorial dispute with Japan. The problem of ownership of the southern Kuril Islands is the main obstacle to the full settlement of Russian-Japanese relations and the signing of a peace treaty after the WWII. Moreover, the amendments to the Russian Constitution approved last year put an end to the Kuril issue, since the Basic Law prohibits the transfer of Russian territories.

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin recently once again has draw the line under the dispute with Japan over the status of the Southern Kurils, which lasted 65 years. At the main event of the Eastern Economic Forum in early September 2021 he indicated that Moscow would no longer decide the fate of the islands bilaterally and questioned the strength of the 1956 Declaration that defines the relations between the Soviet Union and Japan. Thus, Putin removed the threats that would have arisen in the event of the transfer of the islands, experts say, but this could deprive the Far East of Japanese investments.

In the 1956 Declaration the Soviet Union agreed to the transfer of the Habomai Islands and the Shikotan Islands to Japan on the condition that the actual transfer of these islands to Japan would be made after the conclusion of a Peace Treaty between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Japan.

In the conditions of the Cold War the unpredictable and obviously weak Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev wanted to encourage Japan to adopt the status of a neutral state by transferring the two islands and concluding the peace treaty. However, later the Japanese side refused to sign a peace treaty under pressure from the United States, which threatened that if Japan withdrew its claims to the islands of Kunashir and Iturup, the Ryukyu archipelago with the island of Okinawa, which was then under the US administration on the basis of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, would not be returned to Japan.

Advertisement

President Putin, speaking at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, announced that entrepreneurs on the Kuril Islands will be exempt from taxes on profit, property, land for ten years, as well as reduce insurance premiums; customs privileges are also provided.  

Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said that the special tax regime proposed by Vladimir Putin in the Kuril Islands should not violate the laws of the two countries. 

"Based on the indicated position, we would like to continue to conduct a constructive dialogue with Russia in order to create suitable conditions for signing a peace treaty," Motegi added.

Japan said that Moscow's plans to create a special economic zone in the Kuril Islands, which were announced at the Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) in Vladivostok by Russian President Vladimir Putin, contradict Tokyo's position. According to Japanese Government Secretary General Katsunobu Kato, calls to Japanese and foreign companies to participate in the economic development of the territory do not meet the "spirit of the agreement" reached by the leaders of the two states on joint economic activities on the islands of Kunashir, Iturup, Shikotan and Habomai. Based on this position, Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga completely ignored the EEF this year, although his predecessor Shinzo Abe attended the forum four times. It is difficult not to mention that Suga’s statement is merely a populist gesture – the current prime minister is very unpopular, the rating of his government has fallen below 30%, while Japanese hardliners love politicians who promise to "return the islands".

Russia's plans to intensively and rapidly develop the Kuriles, which were announced in July 2021 during a trip to the region by Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, were immediately met with hostility in Tokyo. Katsunobu Kato called that visit "contrary to Japan's consistent position regarding the northern territories and causing great regret," and Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi called it "hurting the feelings of the people of Japan." A protest was also expressed to the Russian ambassador to Japan Mikhail Galuzin, who considered it "unacceptable", since the Kuril Islands were transferred to Russia "legally after the Second World War".

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov also voiced his dissatisfaction in connection with "unfriendly steps in the context of Tokyo's territorial claims" to Russia. And the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov pointed out that the head of government "visits those Russian regions that he considers necessary and on the development of which, including in cooperation with our partners, there is a lot of work to be done."

It is obvious that the problem of the Kuril Islands, as it is viewed by the Japanese side, is unlikely to find its solution on the terms of Tokyo.

Many analysts, and not only in Russia, are convinced that Japan's insistence on the so-called "northern territories" is based on purely selfish and practical interests. The islands themselves hardly represent any tangible benefit, given their modest size and harsh nature. For Tokyo, the sea wealth in the economic zone adjacent to the islands and, in part, the opportunities for tourism development are most important.

However, Moscow does not leave Tokyo with any hopes in terms of territories, offering instead to focus on economic cooperation, which would give both countries much more tangible results than fruitless attempts to antagonize each other.

Share this article:

Continue Reading

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan collects 5 medals at 2020 Tokyo Paralympics

Published

on

Kazakhstan collected five medals - one gold, three silver and one bronze - at the Tokyo 2020 Summer Paralympic Games in Japan, Kazinform has learnt from the official website of the event. Kazakhstan para-powerlifter David Degtyarev lifted Kazakhstan to its only gold medal at the 2020 Tokyo Paralympics.

Kazakhstan hauled all three silver medals in judo as Anuar Sariyev, Temirzhan Daulet and Zarina Baibatina all clinched silver in Men’s -60kg, Men’s -73kg and Women’s +70kg weight categories, respectively. Kazakhstani para-swimmer Nurdaulet Zhumagali settled for bronze in Men’s 100m Breaststroke event. Team Kazakhstan is ranked 52nd in the overall medal tally of the 2020 Tokyo Paralympics together with Finland. China tops the medal standing with 207 medals, including 96 gold, 60 silver and 51 bronze. Ranked second is Great Britain with 124 medals. The US is third with 104 medals.

Share this article:

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending