New funding will help to secure Wales’ place as the home of future tech leaders. Eluned Morgan, the Minister for International Relations, has announced £250,000 in Welsh Government funding to help create the next generation of Welsh technology companies, during her six-day visit to North America.
The Welsh government has pledged the support to match fund cyber start-ups graduating out of the Newport-based tech hub Alacrity Foundation, which aims to nurture new hi-tech leaders through its technology programme, providing graduates with practical business training, software skills and mentoring – as part of a 15-month “boot camp” style course.
The new funds will help seed fund new cyber security companies graduating from Alacrity.
The new funding follows more than £3.7 million provided to Alacrity by Welsh Government, alongside matched funding from Wesley Clover and the Waterloo Foundation, since 2011 to create new tech start-ups in Wales. With up to a further £5m of Welsh Government match funding committed to seeding those new companies to help them grow and flourish in Wales.
The Minister announced the new funding following a meeting with Welsh tech businessman Sir Terry Matthews, chairman of Wesley Clover International, and Prof Simon Gibson, chairman of the Alacrity Foundation.
Speaking during her visit, the minister said: “This funding is further commitment from the Welsh Government to ensure that Wales remains a strong home for our tech sector, which is valued at £8.5 billion – and growing.
“Those graduating from the entrepreneurship programme will have all of the potential and all of the skills needed to be leaders of highly successful tech companies in Wales.
“We, of course, want to see that talent nurtured and taught in Wales, and we want to see their skills and ingenuity employed to the benefit of Welsh businesses.
“That’s why we’ve made the decision we have – we want to make sure that support is in place to help Alacrity’s graduates can make their mark on the tech world.
“We have an incredibly strong technological and cyber-security sector in Wales, and the help of programmes like the Alacrity Foundation is vital in ensuring that we continue to host and support companies working at the cutting edge of technology.”
COVID-19 reveals the shortcomings of a paper-based trade system
According to a recent report by the International Chamber of Commerce, as COVID-19 reveals the shortcomings of a paper-based trade system, financial institutions (FIs) are finding ways to keep trade circulating. It states that the problem being faced today is rooted in trade’s single most persistent vulnerability: paper. Paper is the financial sector’s Achilles heel. The disruption was always going to happen, the only question was, when, writes Colin Stevens.
Preliminary ICC data shows that financial institutions already feel they are being impacted. More than 60% of respondents to the recent COVID-19 supplement to the Trade Survey expect their trade flows to decline by at least 20% in 2020.
The pandemic introduces or exacerbates challenges to the trade finance process. To help combat the practicalities of trade finance in a COVID-19 environment, many banks indicated that they were taking their own measures to relax internal rules on original documentation. However, only 29% of respondents report that their local regulators have provided support to help facilitate ongoing trade.
It’s a critical time for infrastructure upgrades and increased transparency, and while the pandemic has caused a lot of negative effects, a potential positive impact is that it has made clear to the industry that changes do need to be made to optimize processes and improve the overall functioning of international trade, trade finance, and money movement.
“I think it comes down to integrating new technologies in smart ways. Take my company for example, LGR Global, when it comes to money movement, we are focused on 3 things: speed, cost & transparency. To address these issues, we are leading with technology and using things like blockchain, digital currencies and general digitization to optimize the existing methodologies.
"It's quite clear the impact that new technologies can have on things like speed and transparency, but when I say it’s important to integrate the technologies in a smart way that’s important because you always have to keep your customer in mind - the last thing we would want to do is introduce a system that actually confuses our users and makes his or her job more complicated. So on one hand, the solution to these problems is found in new technology, but on the other hand, it’s about creating a user experience that is simple to use and interact with and integrates seamlessly into the existing systems. So, it’s a bit of a balancing act between technology and user experience, that’s where the solution is going to be created.
"When it comes to the broader topic of supply chain finance, what we see is the need for improved digitalization and automation of the processes and mechanisms that exist throughout the product lifecycle. In the multi-commodity trading industry, there are so many different stakeholders, middlemen, banks, etc. and each of them have their own way of doing this - there is an overall lack of standardization, particularly in the Silk Road Area. The lack of standardization leads to confusion in compliance requirements, trade documents, letters of credit, etc., and this means delays and increased costs for all parties. Furthermore, we have the huge issue of fraud, which you have to expect when you are dealing with such disparity in the quality of processes and reporting. The solution here is again to use technology and digitalize and automate as many of these processes as possible - it should be the goal to take human error out of the equation.
"And here is the really exciting thing about bringing digitalization and standardization to supply chain finance: not only is this going to make doing business much more straightforward for the companies themselves, this increased transparency and optimization will also make the companies much more attractive to outside investors. It’s a win-win for everyone involved here.”
How does Amirliravi believe these new systems can be integrated into existing infrastructure?
“This is really a key question, and it's something that we spent a lot of time working on at LGR Global. We realized you can have a great technological solution, but if it creates complexity or confusion for your customers, then you’ll end up causing more problems than you solve.
In the trade finance and money movement industry, that means that new solutions have to be able to plug in directly into existing customer systems --using APIs this is all possible. It’s about bridging the gap between traditional finance and fintech and making sure that the benefits of digitalization are delivered with a seamless user experience.
The trade finance ecosystem has a number of different stakeholders, each with their own systems in place. What we really see a need for is an end-to-end solution that brings transparency and speed to these processes but can still interact with the legacy and banking systems that the industry relies on. That’s when you’ll start to see real changes being made.”
Where are the global hotspots for change and opportunities? Ali Amirliravi says that his company, LGR Global, is focusing on the Silk Road Area - between Europe, Central Asia and China - for a few main reasons:
“First, It’s an area of incredible growth. If we look at China for example, they have maintained GDP growth of over 6% for the last years, and central Asian economies are posting similar numbers, if not higher. This kind of growth means increased trade, increased foreign ownership and subsidiary development. It’s an area where you can really see the opportunity to bring a lot of automation and standardization to the processes within the supply chains. There is a lot of money being moved around and new trading partnerships being made all the time, but there are also a lot of pain points in the industry.
The second reason has to do with the reality of currency fluctuation in the area. When we say Silk Road Area countries, we are talking about 68 countries, each with their own currencies and the individualized value fluctuations that come as a by-product of that. Cross-border trade in this area means that the companies and stakeholders that participate in the finance side have to deal with all kinds of problems when it comes to currency exchange.
And here is where the banking delays that happen in the traditional system really have a negative impact on doing business in the area: because some of these currencies are very volatile, it can be the case that by the time a transaction is finally cleared, the actual value that is being transferred ends up being significantly different than what might have been agreed to initially. This causes all kinds of headaches when it comes to accounting for all sides, and it’s a problem that I dealt with directly during my time in the industry.”
Amirliravi believes that what we are seeing right now is an industry that is ready for change. Even with the pandemic, companies and economies are growing, and there is now more of a push toward digital, automated solutions than ever before. The volume of cross border transactions has been growing steadily at 6% for years now, and just the international payments industry alone is worth 200 Billion Dollars.
Numbers like that show the impact potential that optimization in this space could have.
Topics like cost, transparency, speed, flexibility and digitization are trending in the industry right now, and as deals and supply chains continue to become more and more valuable and complex, demands on infrastructure will similarly increase. It’s really not a question of “if”, it’s a question of “when” - the industry is at a crossroads right now: it’s clear that new technologies will streamline and optimize processes, but parties are waiting for a solution which is secure and reliable enough to handle frequent, high volume transactions, and flexible enough to adapt to the complex deal structures that exist within trade finance. “
Amirliravi and his colleagues at LGR Global see an exciting future for the b2b money movement and trade finance industry.
“I think something that we are going to continue to see is the impact of emerging technologies on the industry “he said. “Things like blockchain infrastructure and digital currencies will be used to bring added transparency and speed to transactions. Government-issued central bank digital currencies are also being created, and this is also going to have an interesting impact on cross-border money movement.
"We’re looking at how digital smart contracts can be used in trade finance to create new automated letters-of-credit, and this gets really interesting once you incorporate IoT technology. Our system is able to trigger transactions and payments automatically based on incoming data streams. This means, for example, that we could create a smart contract for a letter of credit which automatically releases payment once a shipping container or a shipping vessel reaches a certain location. Or, a simpler example, payments could be triggered once a set of compliance documents is verified and uploaded to the system. Automation is such a huge trend - we’re going to see more and more traditional processes being disrupted.
"Data is going to continue to play a huge role in shaping the future of supply chain finance. In the current system, a lot of data is siloed, and the lack of standardization really interferes with overall data collection opportunities. However, once this problem is solved, an end-to-end digital trade finance platform would be able to generate big data sets that could be used to create all kinds of theoretical models and industry insights. Of course, the quality and sensitivity of this data means that data management and security will be incredibly important for the industry of tomorrow.
"For me, the future for the money movement and trade finance industry is bright. We’re entering the new digital era, and this is going to mean all kinds of new business opportunities, particularly for the companies that embrace next generation technologies.”
Time for the #EuropeanUnion to close longstanding #digital gaps
The European Union recently unveiled its European Skills Agenda, an ambitious scheme to both upskill and reskill the bloc’s workforce. The right to lifelong learning, enshrined in the European Pillar of Social Rights, has taken on new importance in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. As Nicolas Schmit, the Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, explained: “The skilling of our workforces is one of our central responses to the recovery, and providing people the chance to build the skillsets they need is key to preparing for the green and digital transitions”.
Indeed, while the European bloc has frequently made headlines for its environmental initiatives—particularly the centrepiece of the Von der Leyen Commission, the European Green Deal—it’s allowed digitalisation to fall somewhat by the wayside. One estimate suggested that Europe utilizes only 12% of its digital potential. To tap into this neglected area, the EU must first address the digital inequalities in the bloc’s 27 member states are addressed.
The 2020 Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), an annual composite assessment summarizing Europe’s digital performance and competitiveness, corroborates this claim. The latest DESI report, released in June, illustrates the imbalances which have left the EU facing a patchwork digital future. The stark divisions revealed by DESI’s data—splits between one member state and the next, between rural and urban areas, between small and large firms or between men and women—make it abundantly clear that while some parts of the EU are prepared for the next generation of technology, others are lagging significantly behind.
A yawning digital divide?
DESI evaluates five principal components of digitalization—connectivity, human capital, the uptake of Internet services, firms’ integration of digital technology, and the availability of digital public services. Across these five categories, a clear rift opens up between the highest-performing countries and those languishing at the bottom of the pack. Finland, Malta, Ireland and the Netherlands stand out as star performers with extremely advanced digital economies, while Italy, Romania, Greece and Bulgaria have a lot of ground to make up.
This overall picture of a widening gap in terms of digitalization is borne out by the report’s detailed sections on each of these five categories. Aspects such as broadband coverage, internet speeds, and next-generation access capability, for example, are all critical for personal and professional digital use—yet parts of Europe are falling short in all of these areas.
Wildly divergent access to broadband
Broadband coverage in rural areas remains a particular challenge—10% of households in Europe’s rural zones are still not covered by any fixed network, while 41% of rural homes are not covered by next generation-access technology. It’s not surprising, therefore, that significantly fewer Europeans living in rural areas have the basic digital skills they need, compared to their compatriots in larger cities and towns.
While these connectivity gaps in rural areas are troubling, particularly given how important digital solutions like precision farming will be for making the European agricultural sector more sustainable, the problems aren’t limited to rural zones. The EU had set a goal for at least 50% of households to have ultrafast broadband (100 Mbps or faster) subscriptions by the end of 2020. According to the 2020 DESI Index, however, the EU is well short of the mark: only 26% of European households have subscribed to such fast broadband services. This is a problem with take-up, rather than infrastructure—66.5% of European households are covered by a network able to provide at least 100 Mbps broadband.
Yet again, there’s a radical divergence between the frontrunners and the laggards in the continent’s digital race. In Sweden, more than 60% of households have subscribed to ultrafast broadband—while in Greece, Cyprus and Croatia less than 10% of households have such rapid service.
SMEs falling behind
A similar story plagues Europe’s small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which represent 99% of all businesses in the EU. A mere 17% of these firms use cloud services and only 12% use big data analytics. With such a low rate of adoption for these important digital tools, European SMEs risk falling behind not only companies in other countries—74% of SMEs in Singapore, for example, have identified cloud computing as one of the investments with the most measurable impact on their business—but losing ground against larger EU firms.
Larger enterprises overwhelmingly eclipse SMEs on their integration of digital technology—some 38.5% of large firms are already reaping the benefits of advanced cloud services, while 32.7% are relying on big data analytics. Since SMEs are considered the backbone of the European economy, it’s impossible to imagine a successful digital transition in Europe without smaller firms picking up the pace.
Digital divide between citizens
Even if Europe manages to close these gaps in digital infrastructure, though, it means little
without the human capital to back it up. Some 61% of Europeans have at least basic digital skills, though this figure falls alarmingly low in some member states—in Bulgaria, for example, a mere 31% of citizens have even the most basic software skills.
The EU has still further trouble equipping its citizens with the above-basic skills which are increasingly becoming a prerequisite for a wide range of job roles. Currently, only 33% of Europeans possess more advanced digital skills. Information and Communications Technology (ICT) specialists, meanwhile, make up a meager 3.4% of the EU’s total workforce—and only 1 out of 6 are women. Unsurprisingly, this has created difficulties for SMEs struggling to recruit these highly-in-demand specialists. Some 80% of companies in Romania and Czechia reported problems trying to fill positions for ICT specialists, a snag which will undoubtedly slow down these countries’ digital transformations.
The latest DESI report lays out in stark relief the extreme disparities which will continue to thwart Europe’s digital future until they are addressed. The European Skills Agenda and other programs intended to prepare the EU for its digital development are welcome steps in the right direction, but European policymakers should lay out a comprehensive scheme to bring the entire bloc up to speed. They have the perfect opportunity to do so, too—the €750 billion recovery fund proposed to help the European bloc get back on its feet after the coronavirus pandemic. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has already stressed that this unprecedent investment must include provisions for Europe’s digitalization: the DESI report has made it clear which digital gaps must be addressed first.
We can’t afford tax havens in the age of #Coronavirus
UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak, appointed to the job just over a month ago, announced the most significant set of British policy measures since the Second World War on Friday, 20 March. The sweeping package—which includes a £30 billion tax holiday for corporations and a government commitment to pay part of citizens’ wages for the first time in British history—would have been unthinkable for a Conservative administration only weeks ago. The unprecedented nature of the measures, as well as the gravitas with which Sunak announced them, drove home the reality of the economic tsunami which the coronavirus pandemic has unleashed.
The global economy, as one commentator noted, is going into cardiac arrest. Central banks from Tokyo to Zurich have slashed interest rates—but this can only do so much to alleviate the pain from millions of workers staying home, assembly lines grinding to a halt, and stock markets going into freefall.
It’s almost impossible to predict the full scale of economic damage while most of the world is still fighting to contain the virus’s exponential spread, and while so much remains uncertain. Will the virus, for example, fade thanks to a combination of strict quarantine measures and warmer weather—only to return with a vengeance in the fall, causing a devastating double dip in economic activity?
What’s almost certain is that Europe is tipping into a fresh financial crisis. “Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures,” admitted ECB chief Christine Lagarde, underscoring that “there are no limits to our commitment to the euro.” The bloc’s major economies, some of which were flirting with recession even before the pandemic, are sure to blow past 3% deficit limits. They are likely to play fast and loose with EU state aid rules, too, as hard-hit firms—particularly major airlines, including Air France and Lufthansa—may need to be nationalised to keep them from folding.
As policymakers try and keep their economies afloat during—and after—this acute phase of the pandemic, they will need every scrap of revenue. It’s outrageous, then, that some $7 trillion in private wealth is hidden away in secrecy jurisdictions, while corporate tax avoidance via offshore tax havens drains as much as $600 billion a year from government coffers. New research indicated that 40% of multinational firms’ profits are squirreled away offshore.
The Tax Justice Network has identified an “axis of avoidance”—the UK, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Luxembourg—which together account for fully half of the world’s tax evasion. The UK bears a particular responsibility for failing to crack down on the widespread financial malfeasance occurring in its overseas territories. While NHS staff on the frontlines of the coronavirus epidemic have expressed concerns that they are being treated as “cannon fodder” amidst a gross shortage of protective equipment, the world’s three most notorious offshore hideaways are British overseas territories.
The most famous is probably the Cayman Islands, which the EU placed on its tax haven blacklist earlier this year. For decades, ill-fated firms from Enron to Lehman Brothers stashed their problematic assets in the idyllic islands, while firms like mining giant Glencore allegedly funnelled bribe funds through the British Overseas Territory.
The Caymans have made a recent attempt to shed this reputation as a fiscal Wild West, pledging to reveal corporate owners by 2023—a move which would bring the island nation in line with EU directives. In the meantime, however, stories continue to emerge illustrating how unscrupulous companies are taking advantage of the Caymans’ lax regulation.
Just a few months ago, the Gulf Investment Corporation (GIC)—a fund owned jointly by the six Gulf countries—asked courts in both the Caymans and the United States to look into the “hundreds of millions of dollars” which have apparently disappeared from the Port Fund, a Caymans-based financial vehicle.
According to court filings, the Port Fund’s sponsor, KGL Investment Company, may have been involved in siphoning off proceeds from the sale of Port Fund assets in the Philippines. The GIC maintains that the Port Fund sold a Filipino infrastructure project for roughly $1 billion—but only disclosed $496 million in proceeds and disbursed a mere $305 million to the fund’s investors.
The “missing” $700 million didn’t just evaporate into the ether, of course. It seems highly plausible that the discrepancy has gone at least partly towards the costly lobbying effort which the Port Fund has mounted to spring its former executives, Marsha Lazareva and Saeed Dashti, from prison in Kuwait, where they’ve been locked up after being convicted of misappropriating public funds. The high-powered lobbying campaign has run up a tab of millions of dollars and roped in everyone from Louis Freeh, the head of the FBI from 1993 to 2001, to Cherie Blair, the wife of former British PM Tony Blair.
The sordid saga is the perfect illustration of how cunning companies can exploit the lack of regulatory oversight in fiscal paradises like the Caymans to keep cash out of public coffers. There are countless such examples. Netflix reportedly shifts money through three different Dutch companies to keep its global tax bill low. Until mere months ago, tech titan Google took advantage of a tax loophole dubbed the “Double Irish, Dutch sandwich”, channelling huge sums through Ireland to “ghost companies” in tax havens including Bermuda and Jersey, both British dependencies.
European leaders can no longer afford inaction on stamping out these financial black holes. Ibrahim Mayaki, the co-chair of a recently-created UN panel on illicit financial flows, remarked that “the money that is being hidden in offshore tax havens, laundered through shell companies and outright stolen from public coffers should be put towards ending poverty, educating every child, and building infrastructure that will create jobs and end our dependence on fossil fuels.”
Right now, it should be put towards retrofitting critical care beds, ensuring that Italian doctors treating coronavirus patients have the gloves that could save their own lives, and providing support to Europe’s small businesses so that they don’t go belly up.
Bulgaria4 days ago
The caretaker government in Bulgaria attacks public service television in an attempt to silence the opposition
Human Rights4 days ago
New Decree on Human Rights in Kazakhstan.
COVID-195 days ago
Mainstream media risks becoming a threat to public health
UK4 days ago
Biden has a Brexit warning for Britain: Don't imperil Northern Irish peace
China4 days ago
Video killed the PLA Star: Cartoons and popstars last resort to attract “Baby” soldiers
EU5 days ago
Parliament votes to take Commission to court over inaction on breaches of the rule of law
coronavirus5 days ago
EU Digital COVID Certificate: It’s now up to EU countries
Corporate tax rules5 days ago
Big countries' tax deal to reveal rift in Europe