Corporate tax rules
#FairTaxation: Commission finally names and shames 7 member states
The Greens/EFA group has welcomed a series of reports from the European Commission, naming and shaming seven EU member states for their role in facilitating tax avoidance.
semester package - to single out Belgium, Cyprus, Hungary, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands for their aggressive tax planning
schemes.
The Commission also published a study on aggressive tax planning
indicators across all EU member states.
Greens/EFA tax justice spokesperson Sven Giegold said: "It is great to see the European Commission at last acknowledges the role of EU countries in facilitating tax avoidance. The big offenders are not just distant tropical locations like Panama and Bermuda. We have long said that the EU needs to get its own backyard in order if it is serious about tax justice. By naming and shaming the worst offenders, the Commission has corrected the huge error made by the Council in excluding EU countries from its blacklist of tax havens.
"The countries singled out today owe it to their citizens, and people all across Europe, to bring forward robust plans to end their complicity in tax dodging.
"This shows the need for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. We need a single set of rules for the taxation of profits that reflect where companies have their real economic activity. This should go hand-in-hand with a minimum corporate tax rate in Europe to prevent a further race to the bottom on rates."
Background
The country reports of the European Semester including an evaluation of aggressive tax measures.
The European Parliament votes on its position for the CCCTB next week.
The Greens/EFA group has tabled an amendment calling on the Commission
to present a legislative proposal on the minimum tax rate.
The new study shows how different tax rules in different member states can be used to facilitate tax avoidance. In several European countries (Belgium, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg and Italy), all large companies have at least one subsidiary in a country with a lower tax burden, which reflects that these member states are potentially more exposed to aggressive tax planning (companies structure themselves to play one set of rules against another one). Moreover, the study highlights how different corporate tax rates in Europe can also facilitate aggressive tax planning.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
