Agriculture
Luxembourg court blocks NGOs' rights on access to court
Today (13 January) Luxembourg court (Grand Chamber) in a final ruling decided that NGOs have no right on access to court and agreed with EU Commission, Council and Czech Republic who started an appeal to a previous decision of the General Court. This is a surprising outcome since the General Court of Luxembourg in 2012 concluded to the opposite, Access to court verdict 2012, and granted NGOs access. The reason for this remarkable change of court's opinion is that they feel that the international Arhus Convention granting the right to access to court is not concrete enough.
NGOs therefore cannot challenge Commission decisions such the decision to massively relax the food standards for pesticide residues as Pesticide Action Network Europe did in 2008, as well as challenge the derogation that Commission granted to the Netherlands for meeting air pollution standards as Friends of the Earth-NL did.
The outcome is the more remarkable since Advocate-General Jaakinen on 8 May 2014 released its advice to court and also upheld the right for access to court for NGO's.
PAN Europe feels it is a sad day for democracy in Europe. Industry can go to court already for years and take advantage of this right by doing dozens of cases on pesticides only. Now after EU-institutes did, also Luxembourg court fails to put in place the proper balance and grant NGO's the right to also challenge the implementing work of Commission. Knowing that almost every Commission decision on pesticides includes derogations of the rules, NGO's will not be able to persue their mission in court and protect people and the environment against undermining EU-rules, watering-down of agreed standards and loopholes and backdoors ignoring democratically agreed Regulations.
PAN Europe thinks EU is lagging behind with countries such as the Netherlands granting the right of access to court for many years already.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Health5 days agoCounterfeit cigarettes drive illicit tobacco trade to highest level in a decade, new study claims
-
Libya4 days agoLibya’s fuel crisis offers lessons for energy security on both sides of the Mediterranean
-
Law4 days agoEU Cybersecurity Act could expose member states to costly investment treaty claims, legal opinion warns
-
European Commission5 days agoSpring semester package: Steering EU economies to increased competitiveness
