Connect with us

Economy

Benchmarks: Restoring confidence in financial markets

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Housing market concept image with graph and toy houseNew EU rules set out to improve the transparency of benchmarks used by the financial markets © BELGA_EASYFOTOSTOCK
Benchmarks are widely used to track market developments, however financial scandals involving benchmarks such as Libor and Eurobibor have shown that they are susceptible to manipulation. The European Parliament's economic committee votes on 31 March on new rules to ensure the full transparency of all benchmarks used in the EU. Dutch ALDE member Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, who wrote the report with recommendations, said: “It is a major step forward in ensuring the future robustness and accuracy of benchmarks.”

What benchmarks are

Benchmarks are indices that measure the performance of something, from interest rates at the interbank market in London (Libor) or in the eurozone (Euribor), to commodities such as gold or crude oil and foreign exchange rates (euro against dollar or British pound against dollar). They are often used as references in financial and commercial contracts, for example a mortgage interest rate may be determined as the Euribor rate plus a certain premium.

Manipulation of benchmarks

For benchmarks to serve their purpose, they have to be seen as reliable and neutral. However, their daily value are often determined by the actions of a few big market players.

In 2012-2013, authorities in Europe and the US carried out investigations into the manipulation of Libor and Euribor.  In December 2013, the European Commission fined eight banks a total of €1.7 billion for taking part in illegal cartels seeking to influence Libor and Euribor. Several more banks were fined for similar offences in 2014.

New legislation

Advertisement

The Parliament’s report seeks to clearly distinguish between critical, or systemically important, and less critical benchmarks in order not to needlessly increase the work of administrators of smaller indices. However, critical benchmarks that track a large volume of trade will have to comply with principles set out by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) about how they are produced and calculated. They will be overseen by a college of supervisors chaired by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and comprising national supervisors. The MEPs already adopted tougher sanctions for financial market abuse in 2013.

Economic affairs MEPs target conflicts of interest in benchmark setting

Share this article:

EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter.

Trending