Connect with us


Comment: Humanity is heading towards Armageddon




We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

t1larg.armeggedonEmpires die as history has shown us but never has such a global event destroyed the whole of mankind in the process. Now this has definitely changed - super-capitalism and globalization has created a monster that is totally out of control that devours everything in its path. In this respect the march of corporate consolidation goes on relentless and where presently a very small number of corporates control the global economy.

Many of these super-powerful corporates have economic turnovers far greater than nations. Indeed presently a mere 2,000 corporations (Forbes Global 2000) have a combined greater GDP than the economies of the USA, the EU, Russia and South Korea all put together. Therefore although nations make laws, the corporations have the economic clout to forge a nation’s laws behind closed doors – and this is humanity’s greatest problem for its sheer survival. For as corporations are not living organisms made of skin and blood et al, they have no empathy with human sustainability. Indeed it is all take and no give back.

Indeed, coming out of the epoch changing ‘recession’ in 2009, inequality increased significantly, the complete reverse of what was the case when the Great Depression of the 1930s ended some eighty years earlier. What was the reason for this?


According to French economist Thomas Piketty in his new book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, when investment returns exceed economic growth, the rich get richer, increasing inequality. As Piketty is an economist recognized for examining incomes reported from tax returns over the 20th century, he is a man who knows what he is stating. Therefore more wealth is flowing to the few than at any other time in the history of the world and through ‘globalization’. Considering this fact globalization is doing nothing but being a regressive step for the majority of mankind. For the facts speak for themselves.

In this respect last year’s Global Wealth Report by Credit Suisse stated that a mere 0.7% of the world’s population controlled 41% of the world’s wealth and the top 10% controlled 86% of the world’s wealth leaving a mere 14% of the world’s wealth for the remaining majority of 90% of the population of the world. This inequality that is in fact growing by the year, is a clear recipe for eventual Agamemnon if common sense is to be used and a level head. But things will get far more acute for the 90% of the world’s people as natural resources run out to sustain human life over the next hundred years or so.

For what is happening is that the world’s natural resources (that cannot be replaced and where several elements have already disappeared forever from planet Earth through over-extraction) are being extracted at an alarming  rate of knots that is exhausting humankind’s capacity to support themselves. And all in the quest of greater year-on-year profits and shareholder value. Unfortunate there will come a time when shareholder value will be worthless, as the market will systematically collapse over a mere few decades and which will have been caused directly through the wealth of the masses not being able to support the markets.


This is why the constantly widening gap in inequality is so shooting the corporation in the foot as when there are not sufficient punkers, they will also be destroyed.  Sheer madness really but greed blinds the truth. For once the majority have not the wealth to support the markets, shareholder value and companies will fail completely.

What has been happening for the past 40-years is a consolidation in all markets that has successively fallen into the hands of fewer and fewer super-corporations and where this will go on indefinitely until in theory, just one company owns all the world’s economic turnover. But where this process of placing more economic power into the hands of the very few creates a world of the ‘majority’ have nots. For this system is a ‘chain reaction’ of continual events of the haves and the have nots and where this ultimately ends up growing into a critical mass of unstable destructive markets, total economic collapse and progressive unsustainability for the whole planet – we are seeing this materialise by the year and where this stage is being reached very quickly now but no-one appears to be aware of this in ‘high’ places.

But all the above predictions are not just a personal assessment, but what major global think-tanks have predicted for humanity and for the world’s dire future also on its present ‘take and not give back’ trajectory.

Indeed the Royal Society (RS), the most eminent and oldest scientific institution in the world and where their Fellowship is the pre-eminent scientific minds, has said that it will not be 100 years before all is lost but in a mere 25 years. The RS assessment in their ‘evidence’ based report ‘People and the planet’, was bleak and where global disintegration would happen over a relatively short period of time with a complete collapse. Indeed the report states at the bottom-line, ‘The current trends of global population growth and material consumption and the concomitant changes in the environment are unsustainable’. The apocalyptic assertions of the RS should not be ignored as complacency is what has brought all empires down ultimately (making hay whilst the sun shines but fiddling at the same time while Rome burns) but where now it is the whole planet that is at a catastrophic risk…an era never before known to mankind with such devastating outcomes that threats, far more destructive than even world wars.

But to show how the sheer greed of the few and powerful corrupt the whole basis of humanity’s being, according to OXFAM, it would take just 0.2 per cent of global income to pull more than a billion of the world's poorest people above the poverty line. It never happens as greed is the greater driving force and where there is no empathy within the super-rich’s thinking for the wellbeing of the majority.

But adding to the Royal Society’s conclusions, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the most prestigious technology university in the world, predicted very similar conclusions. In this respect a study from researchers at Jay W. Forrester's institute at MIT stated that the world could suffer from "global economic collapse" and "precipitous population decline" if people continue to consume the world's resources at the current pace. They predicted a mere 20 years for this happen.

But the big problem with those who are in charge of the decimation of planet Earth and the human experience, are only interested in self-wealth on a colossal scale and do not consider what harm it does to the rest of the world’s population – up to 90% of the people anyway. Indeed the Horizon programme series entitled 'Are you good or evil?' identified that there are many psychopaths running major corporations and where many political leaders also are only interested in power and control.  Put these two inhuman components together in more and more people who control the global system and you have a recipe for Armageddon in future times. It is therefore these people, who for short-term gain whilst they live and breath on this planet, are destroying humanity and where in little more than a few decades the human experience will be no more. For as inequality grows (what happened before all empires were totally decimated and were no more), wars are inevitable as the struggle of the have nots (the vast majority) rise up. This common sense thinking is the only outcome and as China et al elevate their nation to the no.1 economic power over the next few years, the dynamics of survival will kick in and the world will be set on fire.

Not a prediction but a certainty and where even the most eminent science and technology institutions are saying this now.

This is no good of course for the people of the EU, the USA or any nation for that matter, as we are all on a present road to our ultimate demise. Therefore for even governments and their institutions, it is something that requires their primary consideration. If not even they will not exist in a mere few decades from now.

Ultimately, there has to be a new realism that our planet’s resources are running out and that it is in all our interests to control our use of these so that the human experience can continue. But if we take no notice of what is happening to our planet we might as well say goodbye to all future generations as there simply will not be the resources left to support human life. This unfortunately is a truism of the first order and if we do not adhere to what common sense dictates, we as the only so-called intelligent life in the universe to press, will have only ourselves to blame for our extinction. But to achieve this sustainable state, the majority will have to force our political masters and the powerful corporations to see sense no matter what that takes, whether it is by peaceful means or by intelligent revolutions.

For we are only saving our own skins and even those who have created this ultimate problem for humankind’s very existence through their sheer greed. Indeed even psychopaths understand that they are not immortal or if they do, they are certainly mad and that is the biggest problem that all sane humans have to overcome. For intelligence states that the ultimate quest of humans is their survival and where we are not born for short-term gain to the total detriment of the vast majority – just what we have now and which ultimately will be the death of us all, including all the billionaires.

Dr David Hill
Chief Executive
World Innovation Foundation

1. Global GDPs of nations
2. Revenues of the world’s largest corporations in terms of the equivalent of GDP
3. The Royal Society’s Report People and the Planet (2012)
4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Simulation by the Jay W. Forrester's institute, MIT (2012)
5. Limits of Growth – Club of Rome (1972)
6. New Scientist - Earth's Natural Wealth: An Audit (2007)


EU must be ready to not recognize Russian Duma elections says EPP



Russia [nid:114228]

“We need an overhaul of Europe's policy vis-à-vis Russia. We must deter Russian threats, contain Russian interference within the EU and its neighbourhood and strategically support pro-democratic forces in Russia. We have to work on the assumption that change is possible in this country and that ‘democracy first’ is our first task in our relations with Russia. Russia can be a democracy,” said Andrius Kubilius MEP of EPP ahead of the 14 September plenary debate on the future of EU-Russia political relations.

A parliamentary Report, which Kubilius authored and which will be put to vote today (15 September), stresses that Europe should engage with Moscow on issues of common interest, such as arms control, peace building, global security or climate change. Such cooperation should, however, be strictly conditioned by the Kremlin’s willingness to observe human rights and international laws. “The cooperation in certain specific fields should not lead to any concessions on the EU’s values and should never disregard the implications for our partners. We need more courage in taking a strong stance vis-à-vis the Kremlin regime to defend human rights. We must make sure that any further engagement with the Kremlin depends on Mr Putin’s willingness to end aggressions, repressions and intimidations inside and outside Russia,” underlined Kubilius.


The report further stresses that the EU must be prepared to not recognise the Russian Duma and to suspend the country from international parliamentary assemblies, including that of the Council of Europe, in case this week's parliamentary elections in Russia are recognized as fraudulent. “People in Russia must have the right of choice, like people in any other democratic country. When key opposition players and opponents of the Russian ruling party are in prison or under house arrest, then there is no choice. The Kremlin’s continuous repression of all opposition candidates, free media or NGOs undermines the legitimacy and fairness of the elections. We reiterate that the opposition leader Alexei Navalny must be released as well as all those who supported him during peaceful protests,” concluded Kubilius.

Continue Reading


German Greens' co-leader defends embattled chancellor candidate




Co-leaders of Germany's Green party Robert Habeck and Annalena Baerbock, also candidate for chancellor of the Greens, listen to NABU association leader Christian Unselt as they take a walk at the moors of the Biesenthaler Basin nature reserve after presenting an immediate climate protection program in Biesenthal near Bernau, northeastern Germany August 3, 2021. Tobias Schwarz/Pool via REUTERS

The co-leader of Germany's Greens on Sunday (8 August) defended the party's candidate for chancellor at next month's federal election, and brushed off suggestions that he should replace her after she made a string of costly mistakes, writes Paul Carrel, Reuters.

The ecologists briefly surged in the polls to overtake Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative bloc after they named Annalena Baerbock (pictured) as their chancellor candidate in April, but have since waned.

Baerbock's error-strewn campaign has included mistakes in her resume and a scandal over a Christmas bonus payment that she failed to declare to parliament. Baerbock has also said that sexist scrutiny is holding her back. Read more.


"Ms Baerbock is suitable for the office of chancellor, and our task is to ensure that the Greens are strong," the party's co-leader, Robert Habeck, told broadcaster ZDF in an interview.

Asked whether the Greens should replace Baerbock with him as their chancellor candidate, Habeck responded: "No, that's not a debate."

Adding to the Greens' woes, the party will be excluded from the ballot in the state of Saarland in the Sept. 26 national election due to irregularities in the selection of regional candidates following internal squabbling.


"The Greens campaign had a few problems but ... I'm looking forward to August and September," said Habeck, who is party co-leader with Baerbock. "Everything is possible."

An opinion poll published earlier on Sunday showed the left-leaning Social Democrats (SPD) drawing level with the Greens on 18%, behind Merkel's conservatives on 26%. Merkel, in power since 2005, plans to stand down after the election. Read more.

The INSA poll showed that in a hypothetical direct vote for chancellor, SPD candidate Olaf Scholz was well ahead, with 27% support. Conservative Armin Laschet languished on 14%, one point ahead of Baerbock, on 13%.

The Greens presented an "emergency climate protection programme" on Tuesday, aiming to reset their campaign. Read more.

Continue Reading

European Green Deal

Low-income families and middle class home owners mustn't pay for Green Deal says EPP



The EPP Group wants Europe to become climate-neutral by 2050. "This far-reaching transformation of our economies and societies must be done in a smart way, because we want to fight climate change with innovation, competitiveness and European jobs. We want to turn the necessary transformation into an opportunity. We want de-carbonization, not de-industrialization! We do not only want to set targets, but find the best way for Europe to reach these targets, with special focus on hydrogen and in certain cases, gas, as a transition technology," said Esther de Lange MEP, vice chairwoman of the EPP Group in charge of economy and environment.

Her statement comes ahead of the European Commission's presentation of the so-called ‘Fit for 55’ package, a mammoth law package of energy and climate laws aimed at translating the 55% CO2 reduction goal into concrete new rules for transport, industry, buildings and other sectors.

"We must be very watchful about who foots the bill for the Green Deal. It cannot be low-income families, middle class home owners or car owners in rural areas without public transport who have to pay the highest bill," added de Lange, explaining that the EPP Group wants a credible social instrument to address heating and mobility poverty within and between member states.


The EPP Group wants to promote clean cars. "We want to prioritize the development of clean vehicles, electric mobility and zero-emission fuels. We do not want the debate about CO2 emissions from cars to turn into another ideological battle of dogmas. Europe's car industry must retain its global competitiveness and must remain technology leaders and trendsetters for clean cars for Europe and the rest of the world. Much will also depend on the roll-out of charging infrastructure. The EPP Group therefore insists on regular Commission reporting on progress made here and its implications for the realization of the CO2 reduction targets," de Lange concluded.

Continue Reading