EU
#Facebook and #Google in dock over pressure on softening European 'fake news'guidelines
Facebook and Google pressured and “arm-wrestled” a group of experts to soften European guidelines on online disinformation and fake news, according to new testimony from insiders released to journalists at Investigate Europe and published by openDemocracy, the London-based global news website.
Extracts from these testimonies allege that Facebook and Google undermined efforts to make the tech giants more accountable and transparent in their dealings, and applied exertive pressure on representatives of the EU’s ‘high level’ working group.
In the wake of numerous reports of huge disinformation campaigns the European elections, EU politicians and transparency campaigners have called these fresh allegations about the tech platforms’ behaviour a “scandal”.
In particular, the testimonies reveal:
- Questionable process in appointing representatives to the group;
- heavy “arm-wrestling” from Facebook and Google to conditionalize experts, and;
- “troubling” financial and organisational relationships between the tech giants and representatives of the working group.
The group, which comprised leading European researchers, media entrepreneurs and activists, as well as employees from the two tech giants, was convened by the European Commission in May 2018 to explore ways of preventing the spread of disinformation – particularly during election campaign periods.
Its workings, and report findings, subsequently informed the ‘EU Code of Practice on Disinformation’, which was agreed in October 2018.
The EU code of practice was euphorically announced last September as a world first: the first time that the platforms had agreed to self-regulate following common standards. The code of practice was drawn up in response to expert groups' report , which had been published in March 2018. Announcing it, the EU digital affairs commissioner, Mariya Gabriel, said: “I am very happy that the report reflects all our principles, transparency, diversity, credibility and inclusion.”
That wasn’t how some of the experts themselves saw it. In March 2018, during the group’s third meeting, "there was heavy arm-wrestling in the corridors from the platforms to conditionalise the other experts", says a member of the group, one of two who spoke with Investigate Europe under the condition of anonymity, referring to a confidentiality clause signed by all group members.
Another member, Monique Goyens – director-general of BEUC, which is also known as The European Consumer Association – is blunter. "We were blackmailed," she said.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Health3 days agoCounterfeit cigarettes drive illicit tobacco trade to highest level in a decade, new study claims
-
France5 days agoHigh-speed drama shatters Monaco’s tranquil façade
-
Libya3 days agoLibya’s fuel crisis offers lessons for energy security on both sides of the Mediterranean
-
Agriculture4 days agoEU agri-food trade surplus expands in February 2026
