Leisure
Why European countries need more software like GamStop
The rapid evolution of the digital casino sector has brought numerous opportunities to risk seekers, making this entertainment more accessible than ever. Gambling is legal and regulated in most European countries, and user engagement grows daily. At the same time, the prevalence of gambling disorders on the continent somewhere reaches 6.5%, and the figures are alarming.
Governments implement various initiatives to inform players about the possible negative consequences, but educating the population is often insufficient. Stricter measures, including GamStop self-exclusion, aim to decrease the number of people affected by gambling problems and create a more transparent environment for European casino enthusiasts.
UK’s example: Efficiency of GamStop since 2018
The UK is the first state to use a mandatory nationwide self-exclusion integrated into each online casino and sportsbook registered in the jurisdiction. The tool allows restricted access to potentially dangerous content, so compulsive individuals won’t get the temptation to gamble again during the chosen period. Players can still take advantage of CasinoGap list of English casinos not with GamStop that are not forbidden on British territory and offer a broad choice of games and juicy promotions. These sites are not covered by self-exclusion and require customers to be responsible about their activities and set budget limits when playing.
On the other hand, non-GamStop destinations are only suitable for those not at risk of gambling addiction. However, if British users have the first signs of compulsive behaviours, including constant thoughts about bets, chasing losses, and overspending, they should consider online casinos licensed by the UKGC.
Advantages of GamStop for problem gamblers in Europe
GamStop was launched in 2018 and has shown efficiency in the country’s market. According to 2024 reports, over 500,000 people joined the program during six years of its existence, and 73% of participants reported satisfaction with GamStop and mentioned reduced cravings for this risky entertainment.
Other European countries haven’t launched similar systems yet. Although Italy, Germany, Cyprus, etc., already offer self-exclusion, they only accept users voluntarily. At the same time, GamStop analyses player activities on the website and bans them if it notices any excessive spending. Look at some reasons other states should consider the UK’s example.
GamStop Is efficient and brings the desired results
User reports indicate that using mandatory self-exclusion really reduces gambling disorder rates and helps players lead healthy lifestyles. GamStop blocks participants from UK-based casino and betting sites for a period of six months to five years. Despite numerous guides on cancelling GamStop, the ban cannot be cancelled until the user finishes the term, which makes the tool so efficient. Compulsive individuals don’t face the temptation to deposit on gambling platforms again and are forced to switch to other activities.
Additional support during self-exclusion term
Besides restrictions on gambling, GamStop participants get full-fledged support and instant access to helplines and treatment organisations. Users can report their problems anonymously and get detailed guidance on further actions till complete recovery. Coping with gambling disorders independently is complicated for most people, and passing therapies together with other people accelerates the process.
Existing measures for coping with problem gambling in Europe
Many European governments are concerned about the growing rate of people struggling with gaming-related problems. Therefore, local authorities concentrate on resolving the challenge. Currently, policies are mostly based on promotional materials: regulatory bodies aim to increase user awareness about the problem and encourage them to be responsible when joining this risky industry. Various initiatives and safer gaming campaigns are held in Europe. Moreover, licensing bodies strengthen their standards and require operators to provide customers with responsible gambling resources and instant access to helplines.
Alternative self-exclusion tools in European countries
GamStop only works on the UK territory, so players from other states cannot use this tool. However, many regulatory authorities across Europe have already launched similar tools for coping with gambling disorders. For instance, Germany has introduced the OASIS self-exclusion that works similarly to GamStop. Problem players can join it voluntarily and get rid of gambling problems.
The same initiatives were launched in Cyprus, Italy, Spain, and other regions. However, they are not as well-developed as the British system. We bet that most casino enthusiasts have only heard of GamStop, while other tools still need more attention. European governments should concentrate on popularising a responsible gambling approach and encouraging users to report their compulsive habits and use all the available measures to prevent worsened conditions.
The final word
Self-exclusions are controversial: some users report enhanced efficiency and positive health effects, while others search for ways to get around the tool. In any case, GamStop demonstrated positive results in the UK gambling market, and other European countries should consider the British experience in their casino regulations. Integrating the system into all online casinos and bookmaker sites is complicated and costly but eventually brings the desired results. Self-exclusions are a part of the complex responsible gambling policy that must be popularised in European countries and beyond.
Share this article:
-
Ukraine3 days ago
Dmitry Nikolaev: Profession- Marauder
-
Iran3 days ago
A brief overview of the so-called ‘chastity and hijab’ law in Iran
-
European Commission3 days ago
2025 Global Humanitarian Overview: Commissioner Lahbib calls for the respect of IHL and for boosting efforts to address the humanitarian funding gap
-
Nuclear proliferation5 days ago
Nuclear ‘sabre-rattling’: Why is Russia threatening again? — Analysis insights