Connect with us


#China: Deglobalization, discrimination and openness





My recent piece of work on de-globalization and China-WTO issues was published by #China Daily and #EUReporter. I very soon received lots of feedback either favouring globalization or against Chinese social-economic-political directions and presence on its fake presence of openness, non-discrimination, and equality, writes Ying Zhang, Associate Dean & Associate Professor on Entrepreneurship at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.

Ying Zhang, Associate Dean & Associate Professor on Entrepreneurship at Rotterdam School of Management

Ying Zhang, Associate Dean & Associate Professor on Entrepreneurship at Rotterdam School of Management

The opponents' opinions are strong but I am actually very pleased to see China became the centre of (in)tangible discussion and transaction. It shows how important and of attention attraction that China has generated, which might be ironically at the similar level of attraction to all issues emerged after Trump Victory and Brexit. It looks like we won't be bored in this century to experience tremendous transitions and changes. But prior to looking at my publication on China Daily, I want to kindly send some messages to those who do not know or understand China phenomena very well (including history, institutional, economic, and social norms etc.). The message is as follows.


"The western world and some correspondent media, most of the time, didn't ethically reflect what a real China was and is, regardless being able to understand a seemingly-complicated Chinese phenomenon and even its beyond. It is disappointing to see many opinions from the west were led by some media, so that citizens, politicians, and decision-makers towards what has happened about China's (non) market status in terms of WTO regulations, were sadly misled. Even so, I still believe that we should give a shot of understanding to those opinions, especially to those who are short-sighted to comment what has been happening. As a deep believer of Buddhism and Taoism from which most of Chinese were born with and raised up, discrimination and closeness are not the base of our value, in contrast we holding the value of connectedness and collectivism, cooperation, and spirit of being tolerate of differences, etc. Chinese was not cultivated by others to judge using their own value system. Neither do our fellows from the west, I believe. However, the surface of the reality does not echo so. What was the reason there? How come we people can share the same fundamental belief in bringing the best prosperity to our people but at institutional level growing apart?

We must admit that the majority of people from the west have no enough window to completely see what China is and where China has been, which generated a big contrast to the extent to which Chinese has seen and understood the west. With such, impatiently shouting out discriminative judgement with inevitable bias from some of the western countries to China is morally not correct, simply we understand it on the law of the nature. I do see lots of parties raised the issues of freedom, equality, and openness as a "weapon" to judge Chinese performance, and irrelevantly against China's role and contribution to the globalization and the world prosperity. They did look around, but they did not see through. So how come they can understand the sacrifice and cost that China has paid on behalf of those most developed countries to "the lord of this planet". At times, those biased attitudes and opinions have been too extremely strong and shallow!

"I want to put in this way as to those so-called discrimination: We are born differently and developed differently but honoured to co-exist in the same planet with certain rules! We'd better to respect rules and conserve and continue developing positive energy to improve our system for the sake of this planet's well-being. The mentality and behaviour of those wrongly using and supporting so called anti-discrimination and inequality concept by some should open eyes and stand beyond in order to review the antecedents and consequences of existing real discrimination and inequality across countries. Discrimination does come from inequality, and it should be prioritized to be discussed at a global level: why some countries/people are chosen to make rules and some countries/people are chosen to be badly or unfairly treated? why some countries / people are arrogant to design the order to others on what they want? however some must follow? For domestic / private issues of a country or a person, we should learn to respect and leave themselves to deal with, especially learn to ethically not to judge by forcibly applying own cognitive and value system to others. Neither you or I dare to do so.

"China of 1,500 years ago, was in Tang Dynasty and that era was the most prosperous one as the largest economic and civilization contributor to the world. Openness to the world, variety embracing, and collaboration were default values, similar to what the USA had done in the past 300 years and EU to agree to cherish at their setup. Discrimination was heavily dismissed in such an institution. Countries by then with China in trade relationship were well-treated, not only as friends, partners, but also as family members, in order to honorarily seek for prosperity together and fight evil thoughts together. However, in China's Qing dynasty back to 300 years ago, anti-globalization and protectionism dominated and it bloodily dragged the wealthy dragon back to a nothing and as a nobody. People there were extremely poor without status and identity, country was robbed badly without dignity. The story from our shared history is cruel and true. It does clearly mirror and accurately predict! If it will be as it had been on the function of the history, the only variables for us to consider is the time and mindset.... so, what will it be if deglobalization? If it is clear to us, then the question from such should be how shall we together take another serious thought to revolute our value, mind, behaviour to be more responsible and moral, and how to create a virtuous path for the best of us in the future?

"The consequences are here. The transition just started!"



US concern over China nukes buildup after new silos report




Military vehicles carrying DF-5B intercontinental ballistic missiles travel past Tiananmen Square during the military parade marking the 70th founding anniversary of People's Republic of China, on its National Day in Beijing, China 1 October, 2019. REUTERS/Jason Lee/File Photo

The Pentagon and Republican congressmen on Tuesday (27 July) aired fresh concerns about China's build-up of its nuclear forces after a new report saying Beijing was building 110 more missile silos, writes David Brunnstrom, Reuters.

An American Federation of Scientists (AFS) report on Monday (26 July) said satellite images showed China was building a new field of silos near Hami in the eastern part of its Xinjiang region.


The report came weeks after another on the construction of about 120 missile silos in Yumen, a desert area about 240 miles (380 km) to the southeast.

"This is the second time in two months the public has discovered what we have been saying all along about the growing threat the world faces and the veil of secrecy that surrounds it," the U.S. Strategic Command said in tweet linked to a New York Times article on the AFS report.

The State Department in early July called China's nuclear buildup concerning and said it appeared Beijing was deviating from decades of nuclear strategy based around minimal deterrence. It called on China to engage with it "on practical measures to reduce the risks of destabilizing arms races."

Republican Congressman Mike Turner, ranking member of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, said China's nuclear build-up was "unprecedented" and made clear it was "deploying nuclear weapons to threaten the United States and our allies."

He said China's refusal to negotiate arms control "should be a cause for concern and condemned by all responsible nations".

Another Republican, Mike Rogers, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, said the Chinese build-up showed the need to rapidly modernize the US nuclear deterrent.

A 2020 Pentagon report estimated China's nuclear warhead stockpile in "the low 200s" and said it was projected to at least double in size as Beijing expands and modernizes its forces. Analysts say the United States has around 3,800 warheads, and according to a State Department factsheet, 1,357 of those were deployed as of 1 March.

Washington has repeatedly called on China to join it and Russia in a new arms control treaty.

The report on the new silos comes as Assistant Secretary of State Wendy Sherman is due to hold arms control talks with Russia in Geneva on Wednesday.

Sherman was in China earlier this week for talks at which Beijing accused Washington of creating an "imaginary enemy" to divert attention from domestic problems and suppress China.

Beijing says its arsenal is dwarfed by those of the United States and Russia and it is ready to conduct bilateral dialogues on strategic security "on the basis of equality and mutual respect".

Continue Reading


US and China positions at a standstill in entrenched Tianjin talks




With no indication of a US-China leaders' summit in the works, nor any outcomes announced from high-level diplomatic talks on Monday (26 July), relations between Beijing and Washington appear to be at a standstill as both sides insist the other must make concessions for ties to improve, write Michael Martina and David Brunnstrom.

US officials had stressed that Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman's trip to the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin to meet Foreign Minister Wang Yi and other officials was a chance to ensure that stiffening competition between the two geopolitical rivals does not veer into conflict.

But the combative statements that emerged from the meeting – albeit coupled with suggestions from officials that closed-door sessions were marginally more cordial – mirrored the tone set in Alaska in March, when the first senior-level diplomatic talks under President Joe Biden were overshadowed by rare public vitriol from both sides.


While Tianjin did not expose the same degree of outward hostility that was on display in Alaska, the two sides appeared to stop short of actually negotiating anything, sticking instead to lists of established demands.

Sherman pressed China on actions Washington says run counter to the rules-based international order, including Beijing's crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong, what the U.S. government has deemed is an ongoing genocide in Xinjiang, abuses in Tibet and the curtailing of press freedoms.

"I think it'd be wrong to characterize the United States as somehow seeking or soliciting China's cooperation," a senior U.S. administration official told reporters after the talks, referring to global concerns such as climate change, Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea.

"It is going to be up to the Chinese side to determine how ready they are as well to… take the next step," a second U.S. administration official said of bridging disagreements.

But Wang insisted in a statement that the ball was in the United States' court.

"When it comes to respecting international rules, it is the United States that must think again," he said, demanding that Washington remove all unilateral sanctions and tariffs on China.

China's Foreign Ministry has recently signaled there could be preconditions for the United States on which any kind of co-operation would be contingent, a stance some analysts say is a recipe for diplomatic ossification and that leaves dim prospects for improved ties.

Bonnie Glaser, an Asia expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said it was important for the two sides to maintain some form of engagement. At the same time, there appeared to be no agreement in Tianjin for follow-up meetings or mechanisms for ongoing dialogue.

"That will probably leave US allies and partners uneasy. They are hoping for greater stability and predictability in the US-China relationship," Glaser said.

Both sides are likely to be disappointed if they expect the other to give in first, she added.

There has been some expectation in foreign policy circles that Biden could meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time since becoming president on the sidelines of a G20 summit in Italy in October.

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the prospect of a Biden-Xi meeting did not come up in Tianjin, though she added that she expects there will be some opportunity to engage at some point.

Indications are, meanwhile, that the Biden administration may scale up both enforcement actions impacting Beijing – such as cracking down on Iranian oil sales to China – and coordination with allies in the context of countering China, including another summit later this year that Biden is keen to host with the leaders of Japan, Australia, and India.

Biden's White House also has given few signals that it intends to roll back tariffs on Chinese goods established under the Trump administration.

At the same time, cooperation on the COVID-19 pandemic seems almost entirely out of reach, with the United States calling Beijing's rejection of a World Health Organization plan for further study of the virus' origin "irresponsible" and "dangerous".

There has been little sign either of a willingness by China to cooperate with Washington on the climate issue, a priority for Biden, despite energetic entreaties by U.S. climate envoy John Kerry.

"What was on display in Tianjin is that both sides are still very far apart on how they view the value and role of diplomatic engagement," said Eric Sayers, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Scott Kennedy, a China specialist at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies,, said neither side saw much upside for now in being more cooperative.

"And there's no low-hanging fruit for cooperation for either side and any gesture toward co-operation actually comes with significant costs, both domestic and strategic," he said.

"I think we ought to have very low expectations about the two sides finding common ground and stabilizing the relationship in the near future."

Continue Reading


Chinese president Xi Jinping visits troubled region of Tibet



President Xi Jinping (pictured) has visited the politically troubled region of Tibet, the first official visit by a Chinese leader in 30 years, writes BBC.

The president was in Tibet from Wednesday to Friday, but the visit only reported by state media on Friday due to the sensitivities of the trip.

China is accused of suppressing cultural and religious freedom in the remote and mainly Buddhist region.


The government denies the accusations.

In footage released by state broadcaster CCTV, Mr Xi was seen greeting a crowd wearing ethnic costumes and waving the Chinese flag as he left his plane.

He arrived in Nyingchi, in the south-east of the country and visited a number of locations to learn about urban development, before travelling to the capital Lhasa on the high-altitude railway.

While in Lhasa, Mr Xi visited the Potala Palace, the traditional home of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.

People in the city had "reported unusual activities and monitoring of their movement" ahead of his visit, advocacy group International Campaign for Tibet said on Thursday.

Mr Xi last visited the region 10 years ago as vice-president. The last sitting Chinese leader to officially visit Tibet was Jiang Zemin in 1990.

State media said Mr Xi took time to learn about the work being done on ethnic and religious affairs and the work done to protect Tibetan culture.

Many exiled Tibetans accuse Beijing of religious repression and eroding their culture.

Tibet has had a tumultuous history, during which it has spent some periods functioning as an independent entity and others ruled by powerful Chinese and Mongolian dynasties.

China sent in thousands of troops to enforce its claim on the region in 1950. Some areas became the Tibetan Autonomous Region and others were incorporated into neighbouring Chinese provinces.

China says Tibet has developed considerably under its rule, but campaign groups say China continues to violate human rights, accusing it of political and religious repression.

Continue Reading