Connect with us

EU

#Russia: Europe voluntarily punishes itself

SHARE:

Published

on

The future of EU-Russia relations is even more uncertain than ever before. Everyman may observe only deterioration. The mass media broadly covered the extension of the bloc's economic sanctions against Russia up to 31 January. European Union leaders made such decision on 22 June, during a two-day summit in Brussels. This step followed the Washington's decision to broaden its sanctions against Moscow, writes Adomas Abromaitis.

But this is only a visible part of world politics based on the clear desire to punish Russia for annexation of Crimea. US and European politics continue to consider sanctions as the only effective mechanism to influence the Kremlin. Though there has been no great success. Sanction cause counter-sanctions and so on and so forth. Maybe it is high time to try other tools of international diplomacy? Where are the talented diplomats who could reverse the situation and prevent further confrontation? It is absolutely urgent, because it has turned out that Europe has punished not only Moscow but itself.

The most complicated and demonstrative situation is in the energy sector. After a decline in gas consumption from 2001-14, Europe has begun to consume more. For example, last year, the EU consumed 447bn cm, of which 34% was Russian gas. The demand is expected to go even higher because in the next decade, Europe will run short of its gas reserves. Nothing to do, Europe has to co-operate with Russia and try to find the consensus.

The US has its own opinion on this matter. The US also offer gas to Europe. Washington and Moscow are real rivals in the gas supplies to the European states. Some European leaders are even sure the senators were pursuing US economic interests at Europe's expense. This fact proves the Senate bill that says: "The United States government should prioritize the export of United States energy resources in order to create American jobs, help United States…, and strengthen United States foreign policy."

That seems aimed against Nord Stream 2, the proposed Russian pipeline across the Baltic Sea to Germany, bypassing Ukraine. Investors in Nord Stream 2 include five major European companies: Anglo-Dutch Shell and Austrian OMV, German Uniper and Wintershall, French ENGIE. It expected to be very profitable for the states participated in the project. But the US considers it a threat to its own economic interest and successfully uses political background in order to oppose the realization of the commercial project.

Though the US is increasing its liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity, it's not clear whether the price of US gas will be lower than that of the Russian pipeline gas, supplied by Russian Gazprom. At this point, large-scale US LNG exports to Europe appear to be a money-losing enterprise aimed at gaining market share. There is nothing common with politics.

Nowadays Europe should clearly defend its interests and be able to distinguish the real politics from private business interests. It is obvious that the US forces Europe to harden sanctions against Russia and Russian energy sector not because of the Ukraine or Crimea, but because of own economic interests. It is not clear why Europe should be committed to American economic interests and continue political confrontation with an economically more profitable partner under the cover of imposed political motives.

Advertisement

Share this article:

EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter.

Trending