Connect with us

Frontpage

Women's Health: BHRT is not only safer but superior to #HRT

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Millions of women rely on hormone replacement therapy to manage the symptoms of menopause. Hot flashes and night sweats affect two-thirds of all women as they transition into menopause, sometimes for years afterward, severely diminishing the quality of their lives. Unfortunately, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is poised to eliminate women’s access to medications that are often safer and more effective than the alternatives - writes Gretchen DuBeau,  Executive and Legal Director of ANH-USA

During menopause, hormone production decreases. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is meant to give women the proper balance of hormones to stay healthy. There are a number of HRT drugs on the market, but these hormones are not chemically the same as the ones the human body produces—one such product is made from pregnant mares’ urine, another contains peanut oil, a potential allergen.

Many doctors, though, swear by bioidentical hormone replacement (BHRT) therapy, the treatment of choice for roughly 2.5 million women. The difference is that bioidentical hormones are, as the name indicates, chemically identical to the hormones produced by the body.

The difference is crucial. A number of studies have indicated that BHRT is not only safer but superior to the alternatives. According to a 2009 review of published studies, “Physiological data and clinical outcomes demonstrate that bioidentical hormones are associated with lower risks, including the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, and are more efficacious” than standard HRT.

This is also borne out in the experience of patients. Over and over, we hear patients who switch from HRT to BHRT say that they feel like themselves again, that they are no longer tired all the time, or suffering from night sweats and hot flashes, that their sleep is better. They feel like they’ve gotten their lives back. No premium can be put on such extraordinary outcomes.

Bioidentical hormones are usually made, pursuant to a doctor’s prescription, at a specialized pharmacy—called a compounding pharmacy—which makes medications tailored to a patient’s individual needs. This is one of the great advantages of BHRT; it’s not one size fits all but can be customized to a patient’s unique needs.

Advertisement

This isn’t to say that BHRT is the answer for everyone. But women deserve choices, especially when conventional HRT leaves many women still feeling the worst effects of menopause.

This is where the FDA comes in. After a tragic incident where 76 people were killed as a result of a meningitis outbreak linked to a single compounding pharmacy, Congress passed a law to increase federal oversight over these pharmacies. To implement this law, the FDA is in the process of finalizing a list of substances that cannot be made at compounding pharmacies. Bioidentical hormones like progesterone, estradiol, and estriol have been nominated to this list, despite having been compounded safely for decades.

It’s also worth noting the FDA’s conflict of interest. Bioidentical hormones compete with FDA-approved HRT drugs. Drug companies pay user fees to the FDA to get their products approved, and these user fees fund the FDA. The resulting bias in favor of the pharmaceutical industry has been apparent throughout the implementation of the compounding law, with the FDA routinely advising that safe, natural medicines—which compete with FDA-approved products—be off limits to these specialized pharmacies.

Patients, practitioners, and family members should contact their members of Congress and tell them that the FDA is stepping out of bounds in threatening estriol and other bioidentical hormones.

 

 

Share this article:

Share this:
Guest Contributor - Opinion

Opinions expressed are purely those of the author and not endorsed by EU Reporter. The article was unsolicited by EU Reporter, and the author guarantees the truthfulness of the contents of the article. No payment was made by EU Reporter to the author

EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending