Connect with us

Climate change

#Norway – After #COP24 real work starts



UN Climate Change Conference (COP24) participants in Katowice, Poland, have concluded the three-year international negotiations by agreeing on a joint rule book to implement the Paris agreement that will take effect in 2024. The agreements reached will apply equally both to developed and developing countries in assessing and reporting greenhouse gas emissions, global performance assessment to take place every five years starting from 2023.

After two weeks of talks between nearly 200 nations, the conference was extended beyond the schedule by two more days.

According to Minister of the Environment, Energy and Housing of Finland Kimmo Tiilikainen, the rules adopted are strong and clear for all parties. “Climate actions are now everyone’s responsibility”, noted the Finnish official. Ola Elvestuen, Norway's Minister for Climate and Environment stressed that implementation of the most complicated part of the Paris agreement – actual cut of emissions – still lies ahead. “We have the system, and the hard work starts now”, he said.

Evolvment of a balanced climate action plan is a matter of a particular importance for Norway, Europe’s largest exporter of oil and gas. The first step here might be working out a set of national economic development scenarios in the light of Paris Agreement goals with regard to various prices on oil, gas and carbon emission quotas – a proposal made by Climate Risk Commission appointed by the Norwegian government to assess climate risks, in a report submitted to Finance Minister Siv Jensen on December 12.

The commission formed in 2017 presented its vision of risks for national economy related to achieving GHG emission reduction targets and gradual decline of fossil fuels. Experts estimate that a complete fossils phase-out will cost Norway over $800 bln, the amount comparable to its current sovereign wealth fund.

Meanwhile, the country has already taken a number of significant steps towards environmental neutrality. For instance, transport emissions targets were reached three years ahead of schedule. Projects to create reference samples of energy-positive homes and zero-carbon transport sailing ships are now in their advanced stages. In the long term, by 2030, biofuel use in the aviation sector will increase to 30%, making it possible to cut emissions by approximately 17%.

At the same time, given the plans to boost gas and oil production through foreign investment, the country is in a critical need of a compromise sectoral solution. The government’s assessment is that up to 55% of hydrocarbon reserves have yet to be explored. Following the report made by the Climate Risk Commission, their value could drop more than four times to $233 bln should the country further neglect ambitious international climate policies with lower demand for oil products.

The way to tackle this problem lies in joint effort of government bodies and key players on the national market to produce mutually beneficial action plan. This cooperation is of a specific importance against the backdrop of the sector's adjustment to global market changes which is currently underway.

For instance, the Johan Sverdrup field, the largest discovery on the shelf in the past 30 years operated by the Norwegian major Equinor, will ensure annual reduction of carbon emissions by 460,000 tons by means of a new power-from-shore solution to supply the facility. The project implemented in partnership with Total and BP will become one of the most eco-friendly in the international market.

The field will become one of the main drivers for development of Norway's oil and gas industry as well as national economy in general. Experts estimate the field reserves at 1.7-3 bln boe, with its peak production capacity reaching 650,000 barrels per day and a lifespan of 50 years.

Further, since 2015, Norwegian-based companies including ConocoPhillips Skandinavia, AS, Aker BP, LUKOIL Overseas North Shelf, Total E&P Norge AS, DEA E&P Norge AS and others have been carrying out joint environment research within the framework of Barents Sea Metocean and Ice data Network (BaSMIN) and Barents Sea Exploration Collaboration (BaSEC). BaSMIN collects data on environmental impact of offshore facilities, allowing companies to better assess existing ecological risks and improve design of industrial sites for enhanced safety. In its turn, BaSEC accumulates best practices in Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) management.

The steps taken make it possible to effectively adjust production processes to special features of the Barents Sea using multifaceted international experience such as that of LUKOIL, which has operated in the country since 2013 applying the ‘zero discharge’ principle at all of its offshore facilities in the region of presence, meaning a complete ban on dumping and discharge of industrial and household waste into the marine environment. All waste is shipped to shore by tanker for final processing. The Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) has included experience in implementing this principle into the list of recommended practices for activities on the Barents Sea shelf.

Considering further extensive exploration plans on the Norwegian shelf, the government will have to take into account recommendations worked out by the expert commission, develop a set of economic development scenarios regarding different prices on conventional fuels as well as engage oil companies that are already adapting to global market changes into drafting a joint action plan to ensure socially responsible revision of the energy mix to the benefit of all parties. These are only the first steps that need to be taken in the near future to prepare for the next round of negotiations on the Paris agreement – defining the conceptual framework for carbon emissions trading market which is scheduled for 2019. COP24 is now over. The real work starts now.


Climate change

EU climate law: MEPs want to increase 2030 emissions reduction target to 60%



Parliament wants each individual EU member state to become carbon neutral by 2050 ©Adobe Stock 

All member states must become climate neutral by 2050, says Parliament in a vote on the EU climate law, calling for ambitious 2030 and 2040 emissions reduction targets.

Parliament has adopted its negotiating mandate on the EU climate law with 392 votes for, 161 against and 142 abstentions. The new law aims to transform political promises that the EU will become climate neutral by 2050 into a binding obligation and to give European citizens and businesses the legal certainty and predictability they need to plan for the transformation.

MEPs insist that both the EU and all member states individually must become climate-neutral by 2050 and that thereafter the EU shall achieve “negative emissions”. They also call for sufficient financing to achieve this.

The Commission must propose by 31 May 2023, through the ordinary decision-making procedure, a trajectory at EU level on how to reach carbon neutrality by 2050, say MEPs. It must take into account the total remaining EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions until 2050 to limit the increase in temperature in accordance with the Paris Agreement. The trajectory shall be reviewed after each stocktake at global level.

MEPs also want to set up an EU Climate Change Council (ECCC) as an independent scientific body to assess whether policy is consistent and to monitor progress.

A more ambitious 2030-target needed

The EU’s current emissions reductions target for 2030 is 40% compared to 1990. The Commission recently proposed to increase this target to “at least 55%” in the amended proposal for an EU climate law. MEPs today raised the bar even further, calling for a reduction of 60% in 2030, adding that national targets shall be increased in a cost-efficient and fair way.

They also want an interim target for 2040 to be proposed by the Commission following an impact assessment, to ensure the EU is on track to reach its 2050 target.

Finally, the EU and member states must also phase out all direct and indirect fossil fuel subsidies by 31 December 2025 at the latest, say MEPs, while they underline the need to continue efforts to combat energy poverty.

After the vote, Parliament rapporteur Jytte Guteland (S&D, Sweden) said: “The adoption of the report sends a clear message to the Commission and the Council, in light of the upcoming negotiations. We expect all member states to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest and we need strong interim targets in 2030 and 2040 for the EU to achieve this.

"I’m also satisfied with the inclusion of a greenhouse gas budget, which sets out the total remaining quantity of emissions that can be emitted until 2050, without putting at risk the EU’s commitments under the Paris Agreement.”

Next steps

Parliament is now ready to start negotiations with member states once Council has agreed upon a common position.


Following the European Council decision (2019) to endorse the 2050 climate-neutrality objective, the Commission in March 2020 proposed the EU climate law that would make it a legal requirement for the EU to become climate-neutral by 2050.

Parliament has played an important role in pushing for more ambitious EU climate legislation and declared a climate emergency on 28 November 2019.

Continue Reading

Climate change

European Parliament cements position on climate change before haggling by member states



European Union lawmakers have backed a plan to cut greenhouse gases by 60% from 1990 levels by 2030, hoping member states will not try to water the target down during upcoming negotiations, writes .

Results of the vote released today (8 October) confirm their preliminary votes earlier this week on a landmark law to make the EU’s climate targets legally binding.

The law, which contains the new EU emissions-cutting goal for 2030, passed by a large majority of 231 votes.

Parliament must now agree the final law with the EU’s 27 member countries, only a few of whom have said they would support a 60% emissions-cutting target. Lawmakers want to avoid countries whittling it away to below the level of emissions cuts proposed by the EU executive of at least 55%.

The EU’s current 2030 target is a 40% emissions cut.

Parliament also supported a proposal to launch an independent scientific council to advise on climate policy - a system already in place in Britain and Sweden - and a carbon budget, setting out the emissions the EU could produce without scuppering its climate commitments.

With climate-related impacts such as more intense heatwaves and wildfires already felt across Europe, and thousands of young people taking to the streets last month to demand tougher action, the EU is under pressure to ramp up its climate policies.

Groups representing investors with 62 trillion euros in assets under management, plus hundreds of businesses and NGOs today wrote to EU leaders urging them to agree an emissions-cutting target of at least 55% for 2030.

Scientists say this target, which has been proposed by the European Commission, is the minimum effort needed to give the EU a realistic shot at becoming climate neutral by 2050. The Commission wants the new 2030 goal finalized by the end of the year.

However, the climate law will require compromise from member countries. Wealthier states with large renewable energy resources are pushing for deeper emissions cuts, but coal-heavy countries including Poland and Czech Republic fear the economic fallout of tougher targets.

Given its political sensitivity, heads of government will likely decide their position on the 2030 target by unanimity, meaning one country could block it.

Continue Reading

Climate change

Credible net-zero targets need to include explicit plans for carbon dioxide removals



Limiting global warming to 1.5°C, as stated in the Paris Agreement and assessed by the IPCC Special Report on 1.5°C (2018), will require policy action across two types of mitigation: those resulting in the rapid reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and those achieving removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, current governmental commitments to address climate change lack specific plans for mobilizing carbon dioxide removal to achieve the required carbon neutrality – namely a balance between emissions and removals – and collaborative policy frameworks under the Paris Agreement are not yet specific enough on how to measure and fund such mitigation action.

To contribute to understanding of how countries can implement Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and how those efforts can be counted as part of their national commitments to achieve the Paris Agreement targets, the NET-RAPIDO project is launching the report Net-Zero Emissions: the role of Carbon Dioxide Removal in the Paris Agreement.

The authors – Matthias Honegger, Axel Michaelowa and Matthias Poralla from Perspectives Climate Research – present a set of concrete recommendations for credibly including CDR strategies as part of national climate strategies and revised NDCs. These include: the setting of specific CDR targets for 2030, 2040 and 2050; the expansion of research on the consequences of CDR for climate targets, a structured and inclusive debate on its development, and the design of specific incentives for the prioritized CDR technologies.

While the current lack of specific CDR measures may be due to the perception that they are costly or unpopular, together with fear of potential environmental side effects and difficulty in making carbon reduction attractive for industry, the authors find that the Paris Agreement’s provisions for international collaboration can be operationalized to provide a credible way forward. To comprehensively address CDR in the Paris Agreement, using existing instruments, the report suggests the use of cooperation mechanisms between countries to leverage carbon markets and results-based climate finance, and strengthening monitoring, review and verification (MRV) to mobilize CDR domestically and abroad in a transparent and consistent manner.

Examining the Paris Agreement’s definition of mitigation, the authors find that countries’ national climate contribution should be underpinned by transparent CDR deployment strategies, plans and policies. They find that, as with emission reductions measures, most CDR approaches will require effective financial incentives or regulation via government action both at national levels and at the global scale.

Limited acceptance and familiarity among civil society, as well as lacking clarity across international governance spheres relevant to CDR may presently be holding back progress on CDR. Minor adjustments and clarifications regarding pertinent provisions (under the UNCBD, the LC/LP, by UNFAO, IMO, UNEP, and others), may allow unlocking permissible and necessary activities.

Dr Axel Michaelowa, Perspectives’ senior founding partner, said: “Despite their long-term nature, net-zero targets pose tangible and immediate technical policy challenges, which require closer attention. We can learn from past climate policy instruments such as the CDM for building opportunities to address and resolve net zero targets issues for domestic and international implementation and collaboration.”

Matthias Honegger, lead author and Senior Consultant at Perspectives, said: “Society urgently needs to start developing a vision of a net-zero emissions future in order to identify critical steps and deliberately start moving in a direction that would be compatible with achieving the transformation required to get there. He mentioned that the policy planning process needed “an infusion of enthusiasm while defining pragmatic intermediate steps to ensure progress.”

Matthias Poralla, author and Junior Consultant at Perspectives, said: “Concerns over the sustainability and social desirability of negative emissions require early and careful deliberation processes for policy to earnestly and credibly address risks and sustainability concerns thus allowing for viable policy pathways.”


NET-RAPIDO is a project implemented between 2018 and 2021 by Mälardalen University, Perspectives Climate Research and Climate Strategies, aiming to research on readiness, policy instrument designs, options for governance and dialogue aims to create a clear understanding of the opportunities, challenges and risks of negative emission technologies (NETs). The project is funded by the Swedish Energy Agency. Find out more here.

Continue Reading