Video
#Turkey - Human rights lawyer Ebru Timtik dies after 238 day hunger strike
Today (28 August), lawyer Ebru Timtik died after 238 days of hunger strike. Timtuk was one of eighteen lawyers accused of being part of a terrorist organization, under Turkey’s sweeping anti-terrorism laws. The appeals court, which upheld the lawyers' sentences in October 2019, was revealed to give the verdict without reviewing lawyers' appeal. Timtik and Ünsal started hunger strikes on January 2 and February 2, respectively. Aytaç Ünsal, is continuing his fast and was also forcibly hospitalized on July 30. Following the convictions last year, Amnesty International described her trial as g, said: “Today’s convictions are a travesty of justice and demonstrate yet again the inability of courts crippled under political pressure to deliver a fair trial.” Timtik was sentenced to 13 years 6 months in prison last March for "terrorism-related" offences. Eighteen other lawyers from The Progressive Lawyers' Association (ÇHD), were sentenced to a total of 159 years in prison.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Kazakhstan5 days agoAstana's congress of world religions: A global platform for dialogue in an age of division
-
Child sexual abuse5 days agoProtect children from online sexual abuse: Call for urgent negotiations and permanent solution
-
Kazakhstan5 days agoSolana company partners with Kazakhstan on $6B Alatau Crypto Megacity
-
Iran5 days agoWill the Gulf monarchies rise above internecine disputes in the interest of collective security?
