Austria
#Steel European industry marches on Brussels to stop China dumping and reject MES
About 5,000 workers from 19 European countries marched on Brussels on 15 February to urge EU leaders to stop China dumping and reject Market Economy Status (MES) for China.
Milan Nitzschke, spokesperson for AEGIS Europe, said: “We are marching on Brussels today by the thousands to give a clear message to EU policy-makers ‘Say YES to jobs & fair trade; and say NO to MES for China!’”
AEGIS Europe is an alliance of about 30 European industrial sectors which combined generate over €500 billion in annual turnover and millions of jobs.
The march started on 15 February at 11h30 at the Schuman roundabout in Brussels, in front of the European Commission. Workers and industry leaders from 19 European countries (including Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, France, Finland, Germany, The Netherlands, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Spain, Slovakia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were united by the European Industrial Manifesto for Free and Fair Trade.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Child sexual abuse3 days agoProtect children from online sexual abuse: Call for urgent negotiations and permanent solution
-
Kazakhstan3 days agoAstana's congress of world religions: A global platform for dialogue in an age of division
-
Kazakhstan3 days agoSolana company partners with Kazakhstan on $6B Alatau Crypto Megacity
-
Iran3 days agoWill the Gulf monarchies rise above internecine disputes in the interest of collective security?
