Connect with us

China

Chinese bellicosity: Lessons for south and south-east Asia

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

China’s lament

Historically, China has felt aggrieved that it has been denied its rightful place in the world order. Today, a more resilient rising China looks at the USA as principal adversary. China, through its concerted military modernisation and consistent economic growth, feels that its stature among the world order is such that it could challenge hegemony of the USA and emerge as a global player. She is riveted with a desire to challenge Western ideas and to be replace these with concepts and philosophiesthat are embellished with Chinese characteristics. This is manifesting in her expansionist policies, bellicose trade wars, military confrontations in SCS and conflict along western borders with India etc. China cites 100 years of humiliation to legitimise its belligerent actions, as it sees rise in comprehensive national power.Chinese leadership is propagating the idea of Middle kingdom, wherein all other peripheral nations are vassal in status. The idea is being carried too far by the Chinese. We shall see subsequently, how Chinese truculent actions have panned out in the region with itsramifications to neighbouring countries’, writes Henry St. George.

The Push Back

Advertisement

Extant world order, upraised by the Western democracies with great efforts, both in terms of human and economic resources, will not let China alter the systems, without stout resistance. USA has upped the ante against the Chinese unilateralism by countering her with Indo Pacific Strategy and harping on need for a rule based world order.USA and Western Democracies are aligning together to push back against Chinese unilateralism. Evolution of QUAD in its present form is one such example. South and South East Asia, that has borne brunt of Chinese expansionist designs are also realigning and integrating to dissuade China. India, due to its geo-strategic location is fast emerging as a quintessential pivot to countering China. Western World’s concerted effort to fix accountability on China for the pandemic by reviving Wuhan lab leak theory, rallying like-minded democracies against China and countering BRI through ‘build back better world’ initiatives is likely to pay long term dividend in containing China’s influence.

Chinese Truculent Behaviour

Vaccine Diplomacy of China in South Asia. Nepal is one among the countries in South Asia with heavy load of COVID 19. Government of Nepal is dependent on the benevolence of both Northern and Southern neighbours for its vaccination effort. While, India in accordance with its ‘Neighbourhood First Policy’ is at the forefront of vaccine diplomacy, China on the other hand is using coercive measures. China, in order to salvage its image as a virus spreader is actively looking at smaller countries adopting its vaccine. This is part of their soft diplomacy to enhance their image as a munificent state. However, due to lack of transparency in sharing data on trials and efficacy, smaller countries are sceptical about Chinese Vaccines. This is also based on their past experiences of poor or low standardmedical equipment like PPE, testing kits supplied to poorer nations. Chinese diktat to Nepal, Bangladesh and Pakistan to forcefully accept Sinovax/ Sinopharm, is a glaring example of Chinese desperation at vaccine diplomacy to alter perception of the world. It is believed that Chinese Ambassador to Nepal has coercively handed over 0.8 MnSinovax doses to Nepal.Sri Lanka, on the hand has categorically stated that it prefers Indian or Russian vaccine over Chinese. Recently, Chinese selective favouritism in apportioning vaccine doses and their pricing has come under serious criticism by SAARC nations.

Advertisement

Expansionist China in Bhutan& Nepal. China has of been an ardent follower of Mao. Although not recorded, but Mao’s theory propounds control of five fingers emanating from the roof of world vizLadakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh.China, in pursuance of this very strategy is initiating unilateral transgressions in India, Bhutan and Nepal.

Chinese territorial aggression against India and Indian befitting response shall be covered subsequently. Nepal, although claims to be on cordial and friendly terms with China, however Chinese territorial encroachment in Humla district and other bordering areas along Sino – Nepal boundary, paints a different picture altogether. Similarly, militarisation of Doklam Plateau, construction of roads deep inside Bhutan in Western and Middle Sector, settlement of dual purpose villages in Bhutanese territory is a testimony of actualisation of Mao’s Strategy of salami slicing. While, India could be considered as a challenger to hegemony of China, however smaller nations like Nepal and Bhutan need to be dealt with a different yardstick by China. It does not behove well for an aspiring Super Power to stoop down to bullying smaller benign nations and surreptitiously carrying out territorial aggression.

Coup in Myanmar. Debates around Chinese complicity in Myanmar coup has been in the public domain, however implicit involvement need corroboration. Military Junta has most likely obtained tacit approval of China before trumping nascent democracy in Myanmar. China has huge economic and strategic stakes in Myanmar. Chinese BRI in Myanmar, economic investments to the tune of 40 Bn USD, supply of natural gas to Kunmingand implicit support to the Ethnic Armed Groups has made China biggest stakeholder in Myanmar. However, Chinese apparent support to Military Junta and repeated vetoing of sanctions on Tatmadaw at UNSC has drawn flak from democratic forces within Myanmar and from liberal democracies world over. Violent protests, arson against Chinese assets and wide spread condemnation of Chinese interference in Myanmar has off late gathered momentum among Myanmar citizens.

Fraying Relations with India. Chinese aggressive behaviour in EasternLadakh, leading to protracted stand off and Galwan clash needs no amplification. Government of India has taken strong exception and unequivocally denounced Chinese expansionist designs. India has now shed herbenign foreign policy and its sword arm, Indian Army has given a befitting reply to Chinese intransigence. Indian Army’s superlative strategic manoeuvre in South PagongTso forced Chinese to back down and come to negotiating table. GoI, now has clarified that, it can’t be business as usual with China till its borders are tranquil. Resetting of bilateral relations is contingent upon peaceful resolution of border disputes. India has to convert this adversity into opportunity by aligning like-minded countries, especially in South and South East Asia to form a formidable alliance against China.

Lessons Learnt in South and South East Asian Context

Chinese rise in the Asian continent is far from benign as claimed by its leadership. China has embarked on a transcendental shift from Mao’s enunciated policy of ‘hide your capabilities and bide your time’ to more aggressive Xi Jinping’s policy of ‘Chinese dream’ which entails ‘great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation’. The great rejuvenation translates to subjugation of the world by economic, military, coercive diplomacy means etc. Some of the key lessons are elucidated as under: -

  • Chinese rise is not benign; China will utilise comprehensive national power to achieve its objectives of challenging the world order and subsequently deposing it.
  • Chinese cheque book diplomacy is malevolent. It seeks to subjugate weaker nations by drawing them into vicious debt trap. Countries have lost sovereignty to this form of economic blackmail.
  • Chinese soft power projection, through vaccine diplomacy, China Study Centres are to propagate alternate narrative to counter growing chorus among Western countries to investigate origin of Corona virus and propagate China centric ideology.
  • BRI projects are with a purpose to firstly, off load Chinese surplus capacities in neighbouring states and secondly, to trap gullible nations into financial interdependency stranglehold.
  • Chinese malignant ambitions, especially in South and South East Asia can only be challenged by building close knit grouping/ alliances.
  • Unchecked Chinese monopoly in supply chain management, rare earth metals and semi-conductors needs to be addressed on priority.

Tackling Chinese behemoth

Operationalization of Indo-Pacific strategy. As is said, ‘Bully only understands language of power’, similarly Chinese can be deterred only by strong response in all domains, be it military, economic, human resources, backed by a strong military or forging alliances. Operationalisation of Indo-Pacific strategy is an important facet towards that end. An important manifestation of Indo-Pacific Strategy is ramping up of QUAD. Indo Pacific strategy should focus on key dividends viz Maritime security, so as to impose unacceptable costs on Chinese maritime trade in IOR, seizing back initiate from China in developing resilient supply chain management, niche and critical technology and ensuring open, free and inclusive Indo-Pacific.

Economic Integration. South and south-east Asia has untapped potential in terms of human and natural resources that can be leveraged, in case mutually beneficial economic interdependencies are evolved among member nations.

UNSC. UNSC reform is quintessential in the changed global order. Structural changes of increasing number of permanent members or its diversification is essential for equitable representation. Candidature of India, Japan and some of the important African and South American nations needs to be seriously considered for UNSC.

Countering BRI. US proposal of ‘build back better world’ propounded by President Joe Biden during G7 meeting may be the way forward in countering BRI effectively.

Conclusion

With unabated rise in Chinese power, challenges in South and South Asia are going to intensify multifold. Its manifestations are seen in East China Sea, South China Sea, IOR and along Northern Borders with India, Nepal and Bhutan. Chinese aggression in South/ South East Asia can only be countered through robust alliances. Indo Pacific Strategy needs to be given requisite impetus to make it a deterrence against Chinese belligerent behaviour. Like minded nations will have to join together in their concerted effort to counter Chinese behemoth, lest it continues unrelenting with its expansionist designs.

China

Competition: EU, US and the People's Republic of China participated in the Fifth Global Maritime Regulatory Summit

Published

on

On 7 September, senior government officials from the EU, the US and the People's Republic of China participated in the Fifth Global Maritime Regulatory Summit. Participants included representatives of the competition and maritime authorities responsible for regulating international liner shipping in the world's largest liner trade lanes.

The summit covered sectoral developments since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, including the challenges faced by the international container transport sector and broader issues of maritime supply chains. Participants agreed that the pandemic presented operators in shipping companies, ports and logistics services with exceptional challenges, on routes to and from the EU as well in other parts of the world.

They exchanged views on the respective actions undertaken by their jurisdictions, as well as future outlook and perspectives, including possible actions to increase the resilience of the sector. The summit takes place every two years and is a forum to foster cooperation between the three authorities. The next summit will be convened in 2023 in China.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

China

Reimagining a more resilient UN system with Taiwan in it

Published

on

After more than 200 million infections and over 4 million deaths and counting, the COVID-19 pandemic has raged across the globe. This has created a profoundly devastating socio-economic impact on our interconnected world, with virtually no countries spared. The pandemic has disrupted global trade, exacerbated poverty, impeded education, and compromised gender equality, with middle to low income nations bearing the brunt of the burden, writes Jaushieh Joseph Wu, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan) (pictured, below).

As many countries brace for another spike of the virus, prompted by the highly contagious Delta variant, the world looks up to the United Nations (UN) to ramp up comprehensive efforts to resolve the crisis, ensure better recovery, and rebuild sustainably. This is a daunting task that requires all hands on deck. It is time for the global body to welcome Taiwan, a valuable and worthy partner that stands ready to lend a helping hand.  

Over the past few months, Taiwan, like many other countries, has been dealing with a surge of COVID-19 cases after almost a year of success in containing the virus. Yet, it got a handle on the situation and emerged even more ready to work with allies and partners to tackle the challenges posed by the pandemic. Taiwan’s effective response to the pandemic, its rapid capacity expansion to meet global supply chain demand, and its substantive assistance toward partner countries around the world all speak to the fact that there is no lack of compelling reasons for Taiwan to play a constructive role in the UN system.

Advertisement

However, under pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the UN and its specialized agencies continue to reject Taiwan, citing the 1971 UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) as a legal basis for this exclusion. But the language of the resolution is crystal clear: it merely addresses the issue of China’s representation in the UN; there is no mention of Chinese claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, nor does it authorize the PRC to represent Taiwan in the UN system. The fact is, the PRC has never governed Taiwan. This is the reality and status quo across the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The Taiwanese people can only be represented on the international stage by their popularly elected government. By falsely equating the language of the resolution with Beijing’s “one China Principle,” the PRC is arbitrarily imposing its political views on the UN.

The absurdity doesn’t end there. This exclusion also obstructs the participation of Taiwan’s civil society. Taiwanese passport holders are denied access to UN premises, both for tours and meetings, while Taiwanese journalists cannot obtain accreditation to cover UN events. The only reason for this discriminatory treatment is their nationality. Barring members of Taiwan’s civil society from the UN defeats the ideal of multilateralism, contravenes the UN’s founding principles of promoting respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and hampers the UN’s overall efforts.

For six decades, Taiwan has been providing assistance to partner countries around the world. Since the adoption of the UN 2030 Agenda, it has focused on helping partners achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and, more recently, engage in antipandemic response and postpandemic recovery. Meanwhile, at home, Taiwan has fulfilled its SDGs in gender equality, clean water and sanitation, and good health and well-being, among others. Our innovative, community-based solutions are harnessing public-private partnerships for the benefit of society as a whole.

Advertisement

The World Happiness Report 2021, released by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, ranked Taiwan the happiest in East Asia, and 24th in the world. The ranking indicates how the people of a country feel about the social support they receive, and reflects in large part a country’s implementation of the SDGs. Taiwan is willing to pass on its experience and work with global partners to build a better and more resilient future for all.

At a time when the world is sounding the clarion call for climate actions and to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, Taiwan is actively charting a roadmap toward the goal, and has drafted dedicated legislation to facilitate this process. Climate change knows no borders, and concerted efforts are a must if we want a sustainable future. Taiwan knows this, and is working on the best ways to turn the challenges of carbon reduction into new opportunities.

In his oath of office in June this year, UN Secretary-General António Guterres stressed that the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed our shared vulnerability and interconnectedness. He said that the UN, and the states and people it serves, can only benefit from bringing others to the table.

Denying partners that have the ability to contribute is a moral and material loss to the world as we seek to recover better together. Taiwan is a force for good. Now is the time to bring Taiwan to the table and let Taiwan help.

Continue Reading

China

EU-Taiwan relations: MEPs push for stronger partnership

Published

on

In a new report adopted on Wednesday (1 September), MEPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee advocate closer relations and a stronger partnership between the EU and Taiwan guided by the EU’s One China Policy, AFET.

They also hail Taiwan as a key EU partner and democratic ally in the Indo-Pacific that contributes to maintaining a rules-based order in the midst of an intensifying rivalry between the great powers in the region.

Prepare the ground for a new Bilateral Investment Agreement

Advertisement

To step up cooperation, the text stresses the need to urgently begin an “impact assessment, public consultation and scoping exercise” on an EU-Taiwan Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIA). MEPs highlight the importance of trade and economic relations between the two sides, including on matters relating to multilateralism and the World Trade Organization, technology such as 5G, public health, as well as essential cooperation on critical supplies such as semiconductors.

Deep concerns over Chinese military pressure against Taiwan

On another note, the report expresses grave concern over China’s continued military belligerence, pressure, assault exercises, airspace violations and disinformation campaigns against Taiwan. It urges the EU to do more to address these tensions and to protect Taiwan’s democracy and the island’s status as an important EU partner.

Advertisement

MEPs insist that any change to Chinese-Taiwanese cross-strait relations must be neither unilateral nor against the will of Taiwanese citizens. They also issue a stark reminder of the direct connection between European prosperity and Asian security and of the consequences for Europe if a conflict were to extend well beyond the economic realm.

The text, which also addresses a range of other aspects and recommendations related to EU-Taiwan relations, will now be submitted to a vote in plenary. It was approved by 60 votes in favour, 4 against with 6 abstentions.

“The first European Parliament report on EU-Taiwan relations sends a strong signal that the EU is ready to upgrade its relationship with our key partner Taiwan. The Commission must now intensify EU-Taiwan relations and pursue a comprehensive enhanced partnership with Taiwan. Work on an impact assessment, public consultation and a scoping exercise on a Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIA) with the Taiwanese authorities in preparation for negotiations to deepen our economic ties must begin before the end of this year,” said rapporteur Charlie Weimers (ECR, Sweden) after the vote.

More information 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending