EU
EU recovery cash must not go to gas, coal leaders urged ahead of summit
The call comes as representatives from Europe’s coal regions prepare to meet on Monday 16 November to discuss how to spend their EU recovery funds amidst faltering European Parliament climate ambition after two committees failed to exclude fossil gas from the bloc’s EUR 672.5 billion Recovery and Resilience Facility [1] - despite pressure from environmental lawyers [2]. There was a similar case of backsliding in September, when the European Parliament voted to allow fossil gas to be funded under the bloc’s flagship Just Transition Fund [3].
“At a time when coal-dependent regions should be focusing on investing in renewable energy technologies that protect the climate and create long-lasting jobs, the inclusion of fossil gas within the scope of these funds threatens to encourage the notion that Europe can burn its way out of the climate crisis.” said Kathrin Gutmann, Europe Beyond Coal campaign director. “Renewables are future-proof investments, generating up to five times the number of jobs per euro invested than fossil gas. They also won’t need tearing down in a few years, unlike fossil gas. We need our leaders to commit to energy buildout that guarantees people in ex-coal regions stable employment on a healthy planet.”
Also on the agenda of the Just Transition Platform are its terms of reference. Currently it has no agreed definition of what Just Transition is, and is yet to officially recognise that for a Just Transition to take place, coal must be phased out by 2030 in line with climate science [4].
“As a starting point, we need agreement that you can’t have a just transition away from coal without having a plan to phase it out,” said Alexandru Mustață, Campaign Coordinator at Bankwatch Romania. “We also need to be clear that swapping one fossil fuel for another is not a just transition, it simply creates more stranded assets, more lost jobs and more climate damage. In order for the Just Transition Platform to become more than a talking shop, it needs to acknowledge a coal exit by 2030 and put local people in the driving seat of their own transition.”
Notes:
- Analysis of Recovery and Resilience Facility committee votes
- https://www.clientearth.org/
latest/documents/letter-to- budg-econ-joint-committee- recovery-and-resilience- facility-funding-for-gas- projects/ - https://bankwatch.org/press_
release/meps-gas-a-green-eu- budget-by-voting-for-fossil- fuels-in-just-transition-fund - https://climateanalytics.org/
media/report_coal_phase_out_ 2019.pdf - http://www.caneurope.org/
docman/coal-phase-out/3639- 2020-just-transition-or-just- talk/file - https://bankwatch.org/press_
release/leaked-document- czechia-plans-to-spend-eu- just-transition-money-on-gas- and-subsidising-corporations - https://www.euractiv.com/
section/electricity/news/ poland-agrees-to-shut-coal- mines-by-2049/ - Why EU gas infrastructure does not need more subsidies: http://www.caneurope.org/
docman/climate-energy-targets/ 3662-fossil-gas-should-not- receive-public-funds/file
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Asylum policy5 days agoNew migration and asylum rules enter into application: What is changing?
-
South Korea5 days agoEU and Republic of Korea bolster strategic partnership with new areas of cooperation
-
Safety4 days agoAre you prepared for the safety risks of the modern workplace?
-
Agriculture5 days agoCommission proposes €540 million in financial relief and other supports for farmers facing fertiliser crisis
