Environment
EU judges side with chemicals agency over toxics secrecy
EU judges have sided with the chemicals industry, when they ruled that regulator ECHA does not need to release more data on the toxics being pumped into the environment. European chemicals manufacture is a €673 billion industry with a powerful lobby working to conceal its true impact on people and the planet.
In 2011, ClientEarth and ChemSec sued ECHA after it refused to publish data on dangerous chemicals used in the EU. ECHA has already conceded part of the case, revealing the names of toxics manufacturers in late 2012.
The regulator is still trying to withhold specific information on the quantity of dangerous chemicals manufactured every year by companies like Bayer, BASF and Evonik. The 356 toxics in question cause cancer, mutations and hormone disruption in people and animals.
ClientEarth toxics lawyer Vito Buonsante said: “The judges failed to recognize the importance of knowing exactly how much toxics each company produces. We need this information to hold industry to account, to push safer alternatives, and to better protect people from dangerous chemicals.”
A recent report by the European Commission shows lack of information about the health impacts of chemicals in everyday products is the number-one environmental worry for Europeans. Knowing the amount companies produce would help NGOs protect people and consumers make informed choices, while encouraging industry to look for safer alternatives.
The extensive ruling is still being analyzed by ClientEarth experts. ClientEarth and ChemSec are considering whether to appeal the ruling.
For more information, contact ClientEarth communications officer Rose Orlik: [email protected]
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
South Caucasus2 days agoThe South Caucasus at a historic turning point: Between lasting peace and renewed confrontation
-
South Caucasus3 days agoThe security environment of the South Caucasus amid changing geopolitical realities
-
European Commission3 days agoCommission endorses Latvia’s €617 million Social Climate Plan to support vulnerable households and transport users in the clean transition
-
European Commission3 days agoCommission sends Statements of Objections to several companies and trade associations in suspected construction chemicals cartel
