Connect with us

Crime

Food fraud: MEPs call for measures to fix weak links in production chain

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

shutterstock_15306187Recent food fraud cases, including the sale of horse meat as beef, should prompt the EU to review the functioning of the food production chain, step up checks and revise labelling legislation, says a non-legislative resolution approved on 14 January.
The European Parliament voices concern at the growth in food fraud, which it says exploits structural weaknesses in the production chain. MEPs argue that food fraud risks are aggravated by the complexity and cross-frontier nature of this chain, coupled with the essentially national nature of inspections, penalties and enforcement measures.

"The first problem is a lack of comparable data, which means that it is difficult to get an exact picture of the problem. (...) However, we know that we are talking about billions of euros here. Organised crime is clearly getting interested in this," said Rapporteur Esther De Lange (EPP, NL).

"Unlike the US, the European Union still has no common definition of ‘food fraud’, which has long been a blind spot of European institutions. Food-fraud cases are the rotten apples that spoil matters for all those farmers, intermediaries and individuals who do respect the rules and destroy consumer confidence in food and food information," she added. Her own-initiative report was approved by 659 votes to 24, with eight abstentions.

Glenis Willmott MEP, Labour's leader in the European Parliament, said: "One year on from the horsemeat scandal, Labour's MEPs are leading the way in tackling food fraud.

"Food fraud cases are becoming a common occurrence and must be tackled at European level - it represented almost €36 billion (£30bn) in 2012, a year in which the level of fraud increased by 60%. We need better and more frequent inspections and appropriate penalties for rule-breakers.

"Country of origin labelling gives consumers the power to make informed choices, and forces food manufacturers to get a grip on their supply chain.

"I originally proposed country of origin labelling for meat in processed foods in 2011, and had the support of the European Parliament. Unfortunately it was blocked after opposition from the food industry and the UK government, but Labour MEPs will continue to fight in the interest of consumers."

DNA tests and stating the country of origin

Advertisement

The text calls for an EU-wide harmonised definition of food fraud and calls on the European Commission to strengthen the EU Food and Veterinary Office (FVO), which carries out inspections. It also calls for the establishment of a European network to combat food fraud and proposes that DNA tests should be used more widely, to eliminate any species fraud.

MEPs call for more thorough inspections of frozen foodstuffs and for a draft law to make labelling mandatory for meat and fish. Traceability would be improved by making it mandatory to state the country of origin, they observe, including for all meat-based processed products.

Dissuasive penalties

MEPs consider that member states should fix food fraud penalties of at least twice the estimated economic gain sought by the fraudster, and criminal law penalties for cases in which fraud endangers public health.

Background

Recent food fraud cases include horse meat sold as beef, road salt sold as food salt, the use of alcohol containing methanol in spirits, dioxin-contaminated fats discovered in animal feed, labels that state the wrong species of fish and the mislabelling of seafood, MEPs note.

Share this article:

Share this:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending