Connect with us

EU

Cities of Tomorrow conference: Mayors as future rulers?

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

20131024_141800The EU is attempting to shape its urban agenda for cities and launch a debate about their future, particularly in the face of globalization and enormous competition coming from rapidly developing city centres, which attract youth, business, arts and science.

"Cities are too important to be treated as a side issue. They should be central to our thinking," Commissioner Johannes Hahn told the  Cities of Tomorrow: Investing in Europe conference on 17-18 February.

Policymakers met mayors from EU cities as well as experts, including ecologists and sociologists, architects and developers. One of the challenges that many cities have to face is the adaptation to new-age lifestyles, dominated by the booming techno-revolution and keeping pace with the e-generation.

"To meet global competition, we have to open up to young generation and a shift form control model into  trust model of managing European cities, as  the cities should be clasters for new ideas of young people, for innovative companies, promoting technologies and creating infrastructures to embrace their  creativity," said IBM Europe Chairman Harry van Dorenmalen. There was no objection to his futuristic approach, Warsaw Mayor Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz underlined the problems of financing that any professional encounters when attempting to modernize - this, he said, was a real challenge, making the implementation of projects very complicated.

"It is all about implementation - here are many wonderful ideas, but how to finance them?" Fronkiewicz-Waltz added. Mayors' ambition can also become a problem, if demand too much: should every town have an airport and an aqua park, for example?

"The language of the EU insitutions is unsuitable and paternalistic," said on critic of the EU approach, Benjamin Barber, a political theorist of urbanism from New York. "I call it Europarochialism, as the whole idea should be not about 'helping' cities but rather empowering them, to allow cities to redefine themselves, to work on a global level."

Cities are ideal platforms for the promotion of democratic ideas, according to Barber, as modern states are still national, while cities are international and multicultural. He put forward the idea of creating a global board of mayors to exchange experiences on a co-ordinated agenda and promote new projects. "Cities should have a say over their own income, as they create enormous wealth and it is unjust to ‘expropriate’ it, leaving the very creators of the wealth out of pocket. One sad example of this social injustice is the new capital of Europe – Brussels," Barber concluded.

Advertisement

"If from the outside, Brussels is pictured as the ultimate capital of the EU, when you arrive here you realize quickly that it is the capital of Belgium and the fate of the city is in the hands of the mayors of the five communities forming the city," Cardiff University PhD researcher Agata Krause told EU Reporter.

The first thing that an  outsider sees is the messy transport infrastructure, continued Kruase: "A modern city has to meet more requirements in terms of noise reduction, ecology and recreational areas, but one can’t get there if old-fashioned transport is still there, with trams you can hear from kilometres away! In a modern city, there should be tracks for bicycles everywhere, as we can’t reduce pollution and noise without offering an alternative to public transport."

However, public transport remains a challenge: punctuality, interconnectivity and  the actual quality of the vehicles, all these factors remain problematic and discourage inhabitants from leaving their cars at home.

"Parking in town is a real headache: whole areas which could be used for recreation in town are extensively used for parking lots," Krause added. "But unfortunately it is not just a practical, but also a political issue,  a result of the conflict between liberal politicians representing the interests of shop-keepers and socialists who support the interests of inhabitants."

The financing of Brussels remains a puzzle: while being home to an ensemble of European institutions, NATO and numerous international companies, the city does not receive a euro cent for its hospitality. If EU citizens are eager to be proud of their capital, they have to change things, as without proper means Brussels has no chance of living up to its high status as the 'capital of Europe'.

 

Anna van Densky

 

Share this article:

Share this:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending