Connect with us

Economy

Wide support for Commission’s state aid verdict on Ireland’s tax deal with #Apple

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

VestagerCompetition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager (pictured) won wide support from MEPs, in a Wednesday afternoon debate (14 September), for the Commission’s state aid verdict that the tax benefits that Ireland granted to Apple Inc., enabling it to pay substantially less tax than other businesses over many years, were illegal.
Some MEPs criticized Apple and Irelands’ plans to appeal against the decision that Ireland must recover €13 billlion in unpaid taxes and interest. Vestager acknowledged that they have a right to appeal. “But we have taken a robust decision and we will defend it in court," she said.
Vestager called for more transparency on the basic data of multinational companies. Such information should become public, she said, referring to the Commission’s recent proposal for public country-by-country reporting of staff numbers, profits made and taxes paid.

Background

The Commission calculated that the selective treatment by the Irish tax authorities allowed Apple to pay an effective corporate tax rate of 1% on its European profits in 2003, falling to 0.005% in 2014.This is illegal under EU state aid rules, because it gives Apple a significant advantage over other businesses that are subject to the same national tax rules.

The Commission decided that Ireland must now recover the taxes unpaid by Apple in Ireland for 2003 to 2014, totalling up to €13 billion, plus interest. Ireland is challenging this decision.
Parliament’s special committee on tax ruling deals, set up in response to the November 2014 LuxLeaks, revelations, delivered a long list of recommendations to make corporate taxation in Europe fairer and more transparent.

 #LuxLeaks #TaxTransparency

Advertisement

Share this article:

Share this:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending