UK
London ghost tube stations project: Uprates damages claim to £100 million
Ajit Chambers (pictured) worked with Transport for London to open London's abandoned ‘ghost’ tube stations as tourist attractions and multipurpose venues but claims he was defrauded during the procurement process. Thanks to evidence from Transport for London whistleblowers he is now able to prove his case in HM High Court with cumulative losses of over £100 million.
Chambers is quoted as saying: '"Whilst my financial team has taken into consideration Transport for London's profits made from my work to date, they also base damages on our cumulative revenue forecasts that were agreed with Transport for London Chairman Boris Johnson when the project commenced."
It has also become clear that Transport for London Executives may have been lied to by a group of their own employees who pretended that they created the 'London Ghost Tube Station Project' when they presented it for sign off by the TfL Board.
If Transport for London find that these employees were not under their instruction when they committed Fraud, TfL would be able to start personal litigation against their own employees.
Brompton road is now being recovered by the UK Government and an example of Misappropriation of Assets through theft of IP.
The UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy was filmed standing in Front of Brompton Road whilst buyer Dymtri Firtash and his wife have been sanctioned by the UK Government.
As the UK government puts a stop to London Property bought with the proceeds of crime, Chambers' Brompton Road has set legal precedent enabling local government organizations like Transport for London to separate themselves from employees responsible for fraud.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Law5 days agoEU Cybersecurity Act could expose member states to costly investment treaty claims, legal opinion warns
-
Kazakhstan2 days agoKazakhstan cuts water use by 874 mln m³ through new technologies
-
Health4 days agoImpasse in European Union Tobacco Tax Reform: The Swedish veto
-
San Marino4 days agoInconvenient questions about Andorra and San Marino that Brussels should be asking
