Connect with us

Business

Taxpayer pays more for schools and hospitals under George Osborne's PF2 initiative, says property entrepreneur

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

s630_moneyGeorge Osborne's PF2 policy included an overhaul of the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) but property entrepreneur and ex-investment banker Will Davies says this has cost the taxpayer more to build schools and hospitals.

The Labour government instituted PFI as a way for private investment to pay for the construction of vital infrastructure buildings in return for regular payments from the government.

George Osborne was concerned that taxpayer liability had risen to an unacceptable level (£144bn - according to the Office for National Statistics) and his PF2 Scheme will insist on a public sector stake of up to 49% and a director sitting on the board of each project.

"Equity is a more expensive way of raising money than debt and as the government increased its equity stake, it was inevitable that the taxpayer will end up paying more money over the 10 to 30 lifecycle of these projects," said Will Davies - the co-founder of Property maintenance and refurbishment company aspect.co.uk

"PFI has been a success in-so-much that it has paid for the construction or repair of 100 hospitals. If the private sector is making too much profit out of their investment that is the fault of the government negotiators who made the deals in the first place," said Mr Davies.

The government had renegotiated some PFI deals already in existence and had managed to reduce costs by £2.5bn over the lifetime of the contracts.

"I understand that the savings they have made are about £1 billion more than they had hoped for but that is only a tiny dent in the £144bn overall public exposure," said Davies.

Advertisement

Share this article:

Share this:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending