European Commission
Commission seeks views and input on fair licensing of standard essential patents
The Commission has published a call for evidence and a public consultation on standard-essential patents (SEPs). The Commission invites interested parties to express their views and experiences in order to improve the current system, mainly transparency and predictability of the licensing framework. With the call for evidence, the Commission is looking for input on the main problem areas identified with the current licensing framework. In addition, with the public consultation launched in parallel, the Commission seeks to gather views on more specific questions related to SEP licensing and a possible new SEP licensing framework, including regarding its transparency, licensing on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms and conditions, and the enforcement of such a system. The call for evidence and the public consultation will be open until 9 May 2022. SEPs refer to patents that protect technology essential to a standard. As announced in the 2020 Action Plan on Intellectual Property, the Commission aims at setting the right condition to have a transparent, predictable and efficient SEP system. Currently, there is little clarity about what patents are truly essential to standards, who owns the licences to these, or how much companies should pay or earn from acquiring such rights. Today's call for evidence and public consultation build on thorough assessments regarding SEPs in recent years, including a number of studies, an expert group on licensing and valuation of SEPs, a 2017 Communication on ‘Setting out an EU approach to SEPs' as well as more recent webinars with key actors in the field.
Share this article:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.
-
Law5 days agoEU Cybersecurity Act could expose member states to costly investment treaty claims, legal opinion warns
-
Kazakhstan2 days agoKazakhstan cuts water use by 874 mln m³ through new technologies
-
Health4 days agoImpasse in European Union Tobacco Tax Reform: The Swedish veto
-
San Marino4 days agoInconvenient questions about Andorra and San Marino that Brussels should be asking
