Connect with us

Conflicts

Ombudsman criticises cartel investigation comments

SHARE:

Published

on

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Emily O’ReillyEuropean Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly (pictured) has told the European Commission to issue guidelines on public statements made by Commissioners on ongoing investigations. She found that statements by former Competition Commissioner Joaquín Almunia about an ongoing cartel investigation involving the French bank Crédit Agricole created a public impression of bias, that the former Commission had already reached a conclusion about the bank’s alleged participation in the cartel before the investigation was complete.

Emily O'Reilly commented: "The new Commission should acknowledge the maladministration that has occurred in this case under the previous Commission, apologize, and make sure that this does not happen again. I urge the Commission to issue guidelines on public statements by Commissioners about ongoing investigations."

Cartel investigation involving several banks

Crédit Agricole is one of several banks investigated by the European Commission because of their alleged involvement in a cartel as regards interest rate derivatives denominated in Euro (EIRD). While four of the banks settled the charges in 2013, paying fines totalling more than one billion Euros, Crédit Agricole and two other banks rejected the accusations. Their investigation is still ongoing.

In July 2014, Crédit Agricole complained to the Ombudsman that, in several public statements between 2012 and 2014, the then Competition Commissioner had infringed his impartiality obligation by indicating that he had already made up his mind as regards the bank's involvement in the cartel.

The Commission argued that the statements served the purpose of transparency and informing the public about an important case and did not agree with the complainant's interpretation.

Having analysed the different arguments and statements, the Ombudsman concluded that the Commission committed an instance of maladministration. She asked the Commission to draw up guidelines on public statements by Commissioners about ongoing investigations and invited it to reply by 30 June 2015.

Advertisement

You find the full text of the Ombudsman's recommendation in this case here.

The European Ombudsman investigates complaints about maladministration in the EU institutions and bodies. Any EU citizen, resident, or an enterprise or association in a Member State, can lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman offers a fast, flexible, and free means of solving problems with the EU administration.

Share this article:

Share this:
EU Reporter publishes articles from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these articles are not necessarily those of EU Reporter. Please see EU Reporter’s full Terms and Conditions of publication for more information EU Reporter embraces artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance journalistic quality, efficiency, and accessibility, while maintaining strict human editorial oversight, ethical standards, and transparency in all AI-assisted content. Please see EU Reporter’s full A.I. Policy for more information.

Trending