India stands firm as Pakistan's militarized extremism fuels Kashmir bloodshed

The simmering conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir erupted into a full-blown crisis after a brutal terrorist attack on April 22, 2025, near the famed resort town of Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir. The assault, which left 26 Hindu tourists dead, is the worst civilian massacre in the region since the early 2000s — and the evidence points directly to Pakistan-based terrorist groups.

Indian intelligence agencies swiftly identified the perpetrators as operatives from Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistani jihadist organization previously responsible for the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks. Two of the three attackers were confirmed Pakistani nationals. Indian officials, speaking on the record, have accused Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of offering logistical and financial support to the killers.

"This is not a rogue act by fringe elements. This is a calculated, cross-border act of terror backed by Pakistan’s deep state," said India's External Affairs Minister, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, in an emergency statement to Parliament.

While Islamabad predictably denied involvement, its credibility is rapidly eroding on the global stage. Pakistan's claims of innocence ring hollow given its longstanding role as an incubator for extremist groups like LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), and Hizbul Mujahideen, all of which operate openly on its soil with, at best, state acquiescence and, at worst, active support.

In response, India has shown admirable restraint coupled with necessary strength. Prime Minister Narendra Modi ordered an immediate crackdown to root out sleeper cells and militant collaborators within Kashmir, leading to the arrest of nearly 2,000 suspects. Over 48 tourist sites were temporarily closed as a precautionary measure to safeguard civilians.

While some Western human rights groups have criticized India's tough measures, it is important to recognize the context: India, a sovereign democratic state, is acting to protect its citizens from foreign-sponsored terrorism. Calls for "restraint" must first and foremost be directed at Islamabad, which persists in using Kashmir as a battleground for its failed strategic fantasies.

Diplomatic relations between the two nuclear-armed nations have plunged. India has suspended its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty, a 1960 accord that it had upheld with integrity for decades — even during periods of high tension. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s knee-jerk responses — closing airspace, expelling diplomats — reveal a regime more interested in saber-rattling than serious dialogue.

At the center of Pakistan’s destabilization campaign is General Asim Munir, the Pakistani Army Chief. Known for his hardline Islamist sympathies and aggressive anti-India posture, Munir has escalated the rhetoric to dangerous new heights, warning of "total war" over water rights — a threat both irresponsible and dangerous.

Under Munir’s leadership, the Pakistani military has doubled down on its disastrous policy of supporting terrorist proxies instead of building a peaceful, prosperous nation. International experts warn that as Pakistan’s economy teeters on the brink of collapse, its military establishment — desperate to maintain control — is using Kashmir as a convenient diversion.

“The Pakistan Army's obsession with Kashmir is a classic case of state-sponsored terrorism disguised as patriotism," said Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Syed Ata Hasnain, former Commander of the Indian Army's 15 Corps.

The global community, especially in Europe and North America, must recognize this dangerous pattern. Pakistan is not merely a "victim of terrorism" as it often claims — it is a chief sponsor of terrorism in South Asia. It must be held accountable under international law, including potential sanctions and restrictions until it dismantles its terrorist infrastructure.

India, in contrast, has consistently upheld its democratic traditions even under grievous provocation. Its measured, lawful responses stand in stark contrast to Pakistan’s violent proxies and deceitful diplomacy.

The choice facing the world is clear: stand with a democracy defending its people, or appease a militarized state that exports terror.

Photo by Kashish Lamba on Unsplash

Share this article: